N. Laxma Reddy
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Pharmacology
- Oncology
- Co-authors
- V. H. DESHPANDEJames B. FischerIan FlemingGraham J. DurantRobert McBurneyA. V. R. RAOJohn F. W. KeanaJohn H. Hill
- Topics
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (6 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers)Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (5 papers)
- Journals
- Annals of the New York Academy of SciencesJournal of Medicinal ChemistryJournal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
N. Laxma Reddy
22 papers receiving 328 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Organic Chemistry 193
- Molecular Biology 155
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 79
- Pharmacology 33
- Oncology 33
Countries citing papers authored by N. Laxma Reddy
This map shows the geographic impact of N. Laxma Reddy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Laxma Reddy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Laxma Reddy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by N. Laxma Reddy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Laxma Reddy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Laxma Reddy. The network helps show where N. Laxma Reddy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of N. Laxma Reddy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N. Laxma Reddy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N. Laxma Reddy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N. Laxma Reddy. N. Laxma Reddy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 26 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 48 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 41 | |
| 17 | 36 | |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 21 | |
| 20 | 20 |
About N. Laxma Reddy
N. Laxma Reddy is a scholar working on Toxicology, Process Chemistry and Technology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 22 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers) and Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (193 citations), Toxicology (23 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (79 citations). N. Laxma Reddy has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include V. H. DESHPANDE, James B. Fischer, Ian Fleming, Graham J. Durant, Robert McBurney, A. V. R. RAO, John F. W. Keana, John H. Hill, David C. Parker and David Waterson. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.