N. K. Chakradhari
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Instrumentation top 5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Computational Mechanics
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- D. K. SahuG. C. AnupamaS. C. JoshiY. C. JoshiShubham SrivastavPeter MartinezRudolf B. KuhnЕ. А. Семенко
- Topics
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (12 papers)Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (9 papers)Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (7 papers)
- Journals
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyAstronomy and AstrophysicsThe Astrophysical Journal Letters
- Partner nations
- IndiaSouth AfricaRussia
In The Last Decade
N. K. Chakradhari
18 papers receiving 197 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 17
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 202
- Instrumentation 84
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 28
- Computational Mechanics 12
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 6
Countries citing papers authored by N. K. Chakradhari
This map shows the geographic impact of N. K. Chakradhari's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. K. Chakradhari with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. K. Chakradhari more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by N. K. Chakradhari
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. K. Chakradhari. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. K. Chakradhari. The network helps show where N. K. Chakradhari may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of N. K. Chakradhari
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N. K. Chakradhari. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N. K. Chakradhari based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N. K. Chakradhari. N. K. Chakradhari is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | The Nainital-Cape Survey: IV. A search for pulsational variability in 108 chemically peculiar stars⋆ | 15 |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 29 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About N. K. Chakradhari
N. K. Chakradhari is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 204 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (12 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (9 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (84 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (202 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (28 citations). N. K. Chakradhari has collaborated with scholars based in India, South Africa and Russia. Frequent co-authors include D. K. Sahu, G. C. Anupama, S. C. Joshi, Y. C. Joshi, Shubham Srivastav, Peter Martinez, Rudolf B. Kuhn, Е. А. Семенко, Yerra Bharat Kumar and L. A. Balona. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Astronomy and Astrophysics and The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.