Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
V Diretriz Brasileira de Dislipidemias e Prevenção da Aterosclerose
2013343 citationsHermes Tóros Xavier, Maria Cristina de Oliveira Izar et al.Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologiaprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of N Forti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N Forti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N Forti more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N Forti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N Forti. The network helps show where N Forti may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of N Forti
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N Forti.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N Forti based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with N Forti. N Forti is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Xavier, Hermes Tóros, Maria Cristina de Oliveira Izar, Marcelo Heitor Vieira Assad, et al.. (2013). V Diretriz Brasileira de Dislipidemias e Prevenção da Aterosclerose. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia. 101(4). 1–22.343 indexed citations breakdown →
Forti, N, et al.. (1997). [Lipid profile of subjects undergoing coronary angiography in different Brazilian regions].. PubMed. 68(5). 333–42.1 indexed citations
Issa, Jaqueline Schölz, Célia Maria Cássaro Strunz, Sandro Giannini, N Forti, & J Diament. (1996). [Precision and accuracy of blood lipid analyses by a portable device (Cholestech-LDX)].. PubMed. 66(6). 339–42.14 indexed citations
12.
Forti, N, et al.. (1995). [The value of the treatment of dyslipidemias in the prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease].. PubMed. 65(3). 297–9.1 indexed citations
13.
Issa, Jaqueline Schölz, et al.. (1994). [Randomized, double-blind comparative study between pravastatin and lovastatin. Evaluation of efficacy and safety].. PubMed. 63(4). 327–32.1 indexed citations
14.
Forti, N. (1993). [Reductions in lipid fraction plasma levels induced by simvastatin and bezafibrate. Brazilian multicenter study].. PubMed. 60(6). 437–44.2 indexed citations
15.
Diament, J, et al.. (1992). [Prevalence of primary dyslipidemia in subjects with and without family history of coronary disease, based on the reference values of the "National Cholesterol Education Program" (NCEP)].. PubMed. 58(4). 281–7.1 indexed citations
16.
Marzocchi-Machado, Cleni Mara, et al.. (1990). [Simvastatin (MK-733), a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia in elderly patients with atherosclerosis].. PubMed. 54(6). 407–14.2 indexed citations
17.
Forti, N, et al.. (1987). [Lipid profile in normal elderly subjects].. PubMed. 48(2). 77–81.5 indexed citations
18.
Forti, N, et al.. (1986). [Effects of pantethine on blood lipids].. PubMed. 46(4). 283–9.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.