N. De Groot

42.0k total citations
10 papers, 51 citations indexed

About

N. De Groot is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Biomedical Engineering and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, N. De Groot has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 51 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 3 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 2 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in N. De Groot's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (4 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (4 papers) and Particle Detector Development and Performance (3 papers). N. De Groot is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (4 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (4 papers) and Particle Detector Development and Performance (3 papers). N. De Groot collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Switzerland and United Kingdom. N. De Groot's co-authors include Jana Mali, D. Spruit, W. N. Cottingham, A. De Angelis, B. Frois, J. Seixas, Vernon W. Hughes, V. W. Hughes, D. McNally and M. Dönszelmann and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Investigative Dermatology, Computer Physics Communications and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment.

In The Last Decade

N. De Groot

9 papers receiving 48 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
N. De Groot Netherlands	5	31	11	8	5	4	10	51
R. Mankel Germany	4	50 1.6×		6 0.8×	9 1.8×	5 1.3×	8	58
Olivier Couet Switzerland	4	22 0.7×		6 0.8×	8 1.6×	2 0.5×	8	38
C. Georgiopoulos United States	4	14 0.5×		4 0.5×	4 0.8×	5 1.3×	10	27
D. Schwarz Austria	5	22 0.7×		7 0.9×	3 0.6×	3 0.8×	9	46
L. K. Graczykowski Poland	5	36 1.2×		7 0.9×	3 0.6×	3 0.8×	12	45
M. Dunford Germany	3	25 0.8×		9 1.1×	5 1.0×	2 0.5×	7	30
T. M. Liss United States	3	35 1.1×		4 0.5×	6 1.2×		5	39
C. Pulvermacher Germany	2	36 1.2×		4 0.5×	5 1.0×	2 0.5×	6	44
F. Archilli Italy	4	32 1.0×		5 0.6×	2 0.4×	4 1.0×	7	39
A. Wegner Germany	2	21 0.7×		13 1.6×	5 1.0×	1 0.3×	2	38

Countries citing papers authored by N. De Groot

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. De Groot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. De Groot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. De Groot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. De Groot

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. De Groot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. De Groot. The network helps show where N. De Groot may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of N. De Groot

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N. De Groot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N. De Groot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N. De Groot. N. De Groot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Aad, G., Geert-Jan Besjes, S. Caron, et al.. (2016). Centrality, rapidity, and transverse momentum dependence of isolated prompt photon production in lead-lead collisions at √sNN = 2.76 TeV measured sth the ATLAS detector. Physical review. C. 93. 1–28.

2.

Groot, N. De, et al.. (2003). Factorization fits and the unitarity triangle in charmless two-bodyBdecays. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 68(11). 11 indexed citations

3.

Groot, N. De. (2003). From pixels to physics. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 501(1). 229–232. 1 indexed citations

4.

Frois, B., V. W. Hughes, & N. De Groot. (1998). The Spin Structure of the Nucleon. 1–702. 4 indexed citations

5.

Dönszelmann, M., N. De Groot, P. Gunnarsson, et al.. (1998). WIRED — World-Wide Web Interactive Remote Event Display. Computer Physics Communications. 110(1-3). 155–159. 8 indexed citations

6.

Frois, B., Vernon W. Hughes, & N. De Groot. (1997). The spin structure of the nucleon : international school of nucleon structure: 1st course, Erice, Italy, 3-10 August 1995. WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks. 3 indexed citations

7.

Ballintijn, M., F.D. van den Berg, R. van Dantzig, et al.. (1995). Results from the MSGC tracker at SMC. Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements. 44(1-3). 268–273. 2 indexed citations

8.

Angelis, A. De, et al.. (1992). NEURAL NETWORKS IN EXPERIMENTAL HIGH-ENERGY PHYSICS. International Journal of Modern Physics C. 3(4). 733–771. 9 indexed citations

9.

Gaemers, K.J.F. & N. De Groot. (1991). Higgs production and background at LEP. The European Physical Journal C. 49(2). 267–275. 1 indexed citations

10.

Spruit, D., Jana Mali, & N. De Groot. (1965). The Interaction of Nickel Ions with Human Cadaverous Dermis. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 44(2). 103–106. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact