N. D. Epiotis
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Inorganic Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Sason ShaikFernando BernardiJ. R. LarsonSimo SarkanenRonald L YatesD. W. BjorkquistW. R. CherryAndréa Bottoni
- Topics
- History and advancements in chemistry (10 papers)Various Chemistry Research Topics (9 papers)Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyIsrael
In The Last Decade
N. D. Epiotis
37 papers receiving 528 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Organic Chemistry 360
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 179
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 160
- Spectroscopy 124
- Inorganic Chemistry 79
Countries citing papers authored by N. D. Epiotis
This map shows the geographic impact of N. D. Epiotis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. D. Epiotis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. D. Epiotis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by N. D. Epiotis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. D. Epiotis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. D. Epiotis. The network helps show where N. D. Epiotis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of N. D. Epiotis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N. D. Epiotis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N. D. Epiotis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N. D. Epiotis. N. D. Epiotis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deciphering the Chemical Code: Bonding Across the Periodic Table | 9 |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | Unified valence bond theory of electronic structure applications | 5 |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 48 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 45 | |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | 25 | |
| 20 | 34 |
About N. D. Epiotis
N. D. Epiotis is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Environmental Chemistry and Organic Chemistry, having authored 37 papers that have together received 560 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History and advancements in chemistry (10 papers), Various Chemistry Research Topics (9 papers) and Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (179 citations), Organic Chemistry (360 citations) and Spectroscopy (124 citations). N. D. Epiotis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Sason Shaik, Fernando Bernardi, J. R. Larson, Simo Sarkanen, Ronald L Yates, D. W. Bjorkquist, W. R. Cherry, Andréa Bottoni, Marcelo Braga Bueno Guerra and Imre G. Csizmadia. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Organic Chemistry and Tetrahedron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.