N. Boens

1.1k citations
32 papers · 797 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

N. Boens

32 papers receiving 756 citations

Peers

N. Boens
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 327
  • Bioengineering 98
  • Biophysics 59
  • Organic Chemistry 240
  • Electrochemistry 48
Replace T. Azumi with:
T. Azumi Japan
Ginagunta Saroja India
Wolfgang Kuehnle Germany
R. Lapouyade France
Heinrich Labhart Switzerland
F. Dörr Germany
Stephen K. Lower Canada
Mary Mahaney Germany
Edward Blatt Australia
P. F. Barbara United States
N. Boens relative to T. Azumi Japan T. Azumi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
T. Azumi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. Boens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Boens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Boens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Boens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Boens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Boens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Boens. The network helps show where N. Boens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N. Boens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. Boens Line = papers co-authored together N. Boens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986117
2 198492
3 198291
4 199585
5 198847
6 200336
7 198535
8 199231
9 197731
10 199530
11 198422
12 198919
13 197216
14 198215
15 199212
16 200711
17 200711
18 200711
19 198510
20 197810

About N. Boens

N. Boens is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Spectroscopy, having authored 32 papers that have together received 797 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (14 papers), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (7 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (6 papers), Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis (5 papers), Photopolymerization techniques and applications (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (4 papers) and Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (327 citations), Bioengineering (98 citations), Biophysics (59 citations), Organic Chemistry (240 citations) and Electrochemistry (48 citations). N. Boens has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Poland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Frans C. De Schryver, Devin Daems, S. Toppet, J. Vandendriessche, M. Vincent, Jacques Gallay, Hiroshi Masuhara, Marcel Ameloot, Mark Van der Auweraer and G. Smets. Their work appears in journals such as Macromolecules, Journal of the American Chemical Society, European Biophysics Journal, Chemical Physics and Analytica Chimica Acta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact