N. Beck

627 citations
19 papers · 529 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

N. Beck

19 papers receiving 518 citations

Peers

N. Beck
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Developmental Biology 40
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 259
  • Ecology 286
  • Genetics 266
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 49
Replace Lisa Tabak with:
Lisa Tabak Canada
Vincent A. Formica United States
Esperanza S. Ferrer Spain
Katie V. Stopher United Kingdom
David M. Zonana United States
Carole S. Griffiths United States
Lynn M. Brodsky Canada
J. Nevil Amos Australia
Tore O. Elgvin Norway
Bo Nielsen Sweden
N. Beck relative to Lisa Tabak Canada Lisa Tabak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Lisa Tabak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. Beck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Beck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Beck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Beck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Beck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Beck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Beck. The network helps show where N. Beck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N. Beck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. Beck Line = papers co-authored together N. Beck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2005181
2 200577
3 200867
4 200941
5 200339
6 200036
7 200632
8 200414
9 200913
10 20038
11 20107
12 20214
13 20033
14 20022
15 20201
16 20101
17
CT- und MRT-Befunde an isolierten Leichenherzen Vergleich der radiologischen mit den pathologisch-anatomischen Befunden
20041
18 20161
19 19981

About N. Beck

N. Beck is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Molecular Biology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 19 papers that have together received 529 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Avian ecology and behavior (7 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (5 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (3 papers), Plant and animal studies (3 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (2 papers), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (2 papers) and Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (40 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (259 citations), Ecology (286 citations), Genetics (266 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (49 citations). N. Beck has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rod Peakall, Andrew Cockburn, Mike Double, Robert Heinsohn, Michael C. Double, R. Szibor, Ines Plate, Caroline J. Blackmore, Helen L. Osmond and Megan L. Head. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Forensic Sciences, Evolution, Molecular Biology and Evolution, Molecular Ecology Resources and Animal Behaviour.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact