N. Amos

1.2k citations
35 papers · 917 indexed · h-index 18

N. Amos

34 papers receiving 836 citations

Peers

N. Amos
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Nephrology 182
  • Immunology 338
  • Hematology 147
  • Rheumatology 181
  • Immunology and Allergy 60
Replace A Bybee with:
A Bybee United Kingdom
Maryvonne Dueymes France
Joel B. Cornacoff United States
R Yokohari Japan
Michishi Tsukano Japan
Tracy Goodpaster United States
A J Fish United States
J. Marrink Netherlands
T. Sasazuki Japan
Hermann-Josef Gröne Germany
N. Amos relative to A Bybee United Kingdom A Bybee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
A Bybee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. Amos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Amos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Amos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Amos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Amos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Amos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Amos. The network helps show where N. Amos may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N. Amos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. Amos Line = papers co-authored together N. Amos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20236
3 200664
4 200282
5 200036
6 199923
7 199918
8 19956
9 199530
10 199515
11 199520
12
Terminal complement complexes and C1/C1 inhibitor complexes in rheumatoid arthritis and other arthritic conditions.
199124
13 199016
14 198921
15 198726
16 198527
17 19846
18
Guinea-pig nephrotoxic nephritis II. Autologous phase: complement activation without detectable injury.
19774
19 1976201
20
Guinea-pig nephrotoxic nephritis. I. The role of complement and polymorphonuclear leucocytes and the effect of antibody subclass and fragments in the heterologous phase.
197525

About N. Amos

N. Amos is a scholar working on Nephrology, Hematology, Immunology, Immunology and Allergy and Rheumatology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 917 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (8 papers), Complement system in diseases (6 papers), Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (5 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (4 papers), Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (4 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (3 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (3 papers) and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (182 citations), Immunology (338 citations), Hematology (147 citations), Rheumatology (181 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (60 citations). N. Amos has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Israel and United States. Frequent co-authors include D K Peters, J. G. P. Sissons, Bryan Williams, Anwen S. Williams, William G. Love, Richard West, Barbara J. Boucher, I.W. Kellaway, J. Camilleri and P. J. Lachmann. Their work appears in journals such as Lara D. Veeken, Inflammation Research, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases and Clinical & Experimental Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026