M. Lynne Pezzullo

748 total citations
8 papers, 575 citations indexed

About

M. Lynne Pezzullo is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Ophthalmology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Lynne Pezzullo has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 575 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Epidemiology, 5 papers in Ophthalmology and 4 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in M. Lynne Pezzullo's work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (6 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (4 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers). M. Lynne Pezzullo is often cited by papers focused on Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (6 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (4 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers). M. Lynne Pezzullo collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. M. Lynne Pezzullo's co-authors include Hugh R. Taylor, Jill Keeffe, Hien Thi Vu, Jie Jin Wang, Elena Rochtchina, Paul Mitchell, Masakazu Yamada, Kensaku Miyake, Yoshimune Hiratsuka and Shigeru Takano and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and The Medical Journal of Australia.

In The Last Decade

M. Lynne Pezzullo

8 papers receiving 556 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M. Lynne Pezzullo Australia	8	365	257	239	35	32	8	575
Dandan Zheng China	11	65 0.2×	73 0.3×	94 0.4×	24 0.7×	37 1.2×	20	277
PETER BERNTH‐PETERSEN Denmark	17	735 2.0×	381 1.5×	521 2.2×	3 0.1×	23 0.7×	30	954
Susan A. Primo United States	9	446 1.2×	212 0.8×	266 1.1×	2 0.1×	73 2.3×	21	644
Christine Powell United Kingdom	14	257 0.7×	120 0.5×	300 1.3×	4 0.1×	86 2.7×	25	516
Ana Patrícia Marques Portugal	12	206 0.6×	133 0.5×	167 0.7×	2 0.1×	15 0.5×	30	422
N A Frost United Kingdom	13	526 1.4×	313 1.2×	368 1.5×		63 2.0×	22	720
Ilesh Patel United States	11	354 1.0×	235 0.9×	328 1.4×		55 1.7×	18	579
Mary Lawrence United States	12	550 1.5×	350 1.4×	447 1.9×		97 3.0×	22	815
Shivani Majithia Singapore	15	403 1.1×	352 1.4×	97 0.4×		16 0.5×	37	580
Peggy Pei-Chia Chiang Australia	14	381 1.0×	240 0.9×	248 1.0×		14 0.4×	22	591

Countries citing papers authored by M. Lynne Pezzullo

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Lynne Pezzullo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Lynne Pezzullo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Lynne Pezzullo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Lynne Pezzullo

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Lynne Pezzullo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Lynne Pezzullo. The network helps show where M. Lynne Pezzullo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Lynne Pezzullo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Lynne Pezzullo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Lynne Pezzullo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Lynne Pezzullo. M. Lynne Pezzullo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Dirani, Mohamed, Jonathan G. Crowston, Peter Moore, et al.. (2011). Economic impact of primary open-angle glaucoma in Australia. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 39(7). 623–632. 69 indexed citations

2.

Cruess, Alan F., Keith Gordon, Lorne Bellan, Scott G. Mitchell, & M. Lynne Pezzullo. (2011). The cost of vision loss in Canada. 2. Results. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. 46(4). 315–318. 66 indexed citations

3.

Gordon, Keith, Alan F. Cruess, Lorne Bellan, Scott G. Mitchell, & M. Lynne Pezzullo. (2011). The cost of vision loss in Canada. 1. Methodology. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. 46(4). 310–314. 11 indexed citations

4.

Yamada, Masakazu, Yoshimune Hiratsuka, M. Lynne Pezzullo, et al.. (2010). Prevalence of Visual Impairment in the Adult Japanese Population by Cause and Severity and Future Projections. Ophthalmic Epidemiology. 17(1). 50–57. 138 indexed citations

5.

Frick, Kevin D., Steven Kymes, Paul P. Lee, et al.. (2010). The Cost of Visual Impairment: Purposes, Perspectives, and Guidance. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 51(4). 1801–1801. 37 indexed citations

6.

Mar, Chris Del, et al.. (2009). Cost of treating otitis media in Australia. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research. 9(2). 133–141. 42 indexed citations

7.

Taylor, Hugh R., et al.. (2006). Costs of Interventions for Visual Impairment. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 143(4). 561–565.e1. 39 indexed citations

8.

Taylor, Hugh R., Jill Keeffe, Hien Thi Vu, et al.. (2005). Vision loss in Australia. The Medical Journal of Australia. 182(11). 565–568. 173 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact