Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics.
1988736 citationsJohn Eatwell, Murray Milgate et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Murray Milgate
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Murray Milgate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Murray Milgate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Murray Milgate more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Murray Milgate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Murray Milgate. The network helps show where Murray Milgate may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Murray Milgate
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Murray Milgate.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Murray Milgate based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Murray Milgate. Murray Milgate is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Milgate, Murray, et al.. (2023). Luigi Pasinetti 1930–2023. Contributions to Political Economy. 42(1). 3–5.1 indexed citations
2.
Milgate, Murray & Shannon C. Stimson. (2011). After Adam Smith. Princeton University Press eBooks.1 indexed citations
3.
Milgate, Murray & Shannon C. Stimson. (2011). After Adam Smith. Princeton University Press eBooks.
4.
Eatwell, John, et al.. (1992). Contributions to Political Economy. Medical Entomology and Zoology.21 indexed citations
5.
Milgate, Murray & Shannon C. Stimson. (1991). Ricardian Politics. Princeton University Press eBooks.16 indexed citations
6.
Eatwell, John, Murray Milgate, & Peter Newman. (1991). The New Palgrave : the world of economics.15 indexed citations
7.
Eatwell, John, Murray Milgate, & Peter Newman. (1990). The New Palgrave : utility and probability. W.W. Norton eBooks.32 indexed citations
8.
Eatwell, John, Murray Milgate, & Peter Newman. (1990). Time series and statistics : the New Palgrave.2 indexed citations
9.
Eatwell, John, et al.. (1990). Problems of the planned economy : the New Palgrave.3 indexed citations
10.
Eatwell, John, et al.. (1989). The new palgrave : money. W.W. Norton eBooks.20 indexed citations
11.
Eatwell, John, et al.. (1989). Finance : the New Palgrave.2 indexed citations
12.
Eatwell, John, et al.. (1989). The Invisible hand : the New Palgrave.6 indexed citations
13.
Eatwell, John, Murray Milgate, & Peter Newman. (1989). The new Palgrave : Social economics.25 indexed citations
14.
Eatwell, John, Murray Milgate, & Peter Newman. (1989). General equilibrium : the New Palgrave.10 indexed citations
15.
Eatwell, John, et al.. (1989). Allocation, information, and markets : the New Palgrave.31 indexed citations
16.
Eatwell, John, et al.. (1989). The new palgrave : game theory. Medical Entomology and Zoology.37 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.