Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Elements of Pure Economics; or, The Theory of Social Wealth.
1955308 citationsLéon Walras, William Jaffé et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Léon Walras's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Léon Walras with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Léon Walras more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Léon Walras. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Léon Walras. The network helps show where Léon Walras may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Léon Walras
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Léon Walras.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Léon Walras based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Léon Walras. Léon Walras is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Walras, Léon. (2007). Theory of credit. 67–88.2 indexed citations
5.
Walras, Léon, et al.. (2005). Studies in applied economics : theory of the production of social wealth. Routledge eBooks.13 indexed citations
6.
Walras, Léon, et al.. (2005). Oeuvres économiques complètes. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja).5 indexed citations
7.
Walras, Léon, et al.. (2001). L'économie politique et la justice. Economica eBooks.2 indexed citations
8.
Bridel, Pascal, et al.. (1996). Le chêne et l'architecte : un siècle de comptes rendus bibliographiques des Eléments d'économie politique pure de Léon Walras : textes et commentaires. Librairie Droz eBooks.5 indexed citations
9.
Walras, Léon, et al.. (1995). Exposition des lois de l'échange et des règles de l'industrie qui s'en déduisent. Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies).4 indexed citations
10.
Walras, Léon, et al.. (1990). Les associations populaires coopératives.1 indexed citations
11.
Walras, Léon. (1990). Études d'économie sociale (théorie de la répartition de la richesse sociale). Galiciana (Xunta de Galicia).21 indexed citations
12.
Walras, Léon & Peter Holmes. (1980). The state and the railways. Journal of Public Economics. 13(1). 81–100.10 indexed citations
Walras, Léon. (1976). Éléments d'économie politique pure, ou, Théorie de la richesse sociale. Galiciana (Xunta de Galicia).148 indexed citations
15.
Walras, Léon. (1974). L'application des mathématiques à l'économie politique et sociale. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
16.
Walras, Léon. (1970). L'économie politique et la justice : examen critique et réfutation des doctrines économiques de M. P.-J. Proudhon.2 indexed citations
Solow, Robert M., Léon Walras, & William Jaffé. (1956). Elements of Pure Economics. Econometrica. 24(1). 87–87.146 indexed citations
20.
Walras, Léon, et al.. (1955). Elements of Pure Economics. Land Economics. 31(2). 164–164.273 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.