Muhammad Ishaq

787 citations
71 papers · 540 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Muhammad Ishaq

58 papers receiving 525 citations

Peers

Muhammad Ishaq
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Geometry and Topology 316
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 316
  • Algebra and Number Theory 58
  • Modeling and Simulation 31
  • Organic Chemistry 139
Replace Tamás Lengyel with:
Tamás Lengyel United States
Saad Ihsan Butt Pakistan
Robert Whitley United States
Muhammad Farhan Hanif Pakistan
Xiaochun Cai China
Woo Young Lee South Korea
Xiaomin Tang China
Muhammad Anwar Chaudhry Pakistan
András Bíró Hungary
Per Holm Denmark
Muhammad Ishaq relative to Tamás Lengyel United States Tamás Lengyel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.3×
Tamás Lengyel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Muhammad Ishaq

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Muhammad Ishaq's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Muhammad Ishaq with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Muhammad Ishaq more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Muhammad Ishaq

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Muhammad Ishaq. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Muhammad Ishaq. The network helps show where Muhammad Ishaq may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Muhammad Ishaq, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Muhammad Ishaq Line = papers co-authored together Muhammad Ishaq links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201833
2 201928
3 201928
4 201827
5 201926
6 201124
7 202024
8 201424
9 201821
10 201919
11 201919
12 201918
13 201818
14 198916
15 201813
16 201312
17 202011
18 201110
19 202110
20 201210

About Muhammad Ishaq

Muhammad Ishaq is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory, Organic Chemistry and Epidemiology, having authored 71 papers that have together received 540 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Graph theory and applications (23 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (20 papers), Commutative Algebra and Its Applications (17 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (16 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (10 papers), Free Radicals and Antioxidants (10 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (5 papers) and Market Dynamics and Volatility (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (316 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (316 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (58 citations), Modeling and Simulation (31 citations) and Organic Chemistry (139 citations). Muhammad Ishaq has collaborated with scholars based in Pakistan, China and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Zahid Iqbal, Adnan Aslam, Muhammad Aamir, Wei Gao, Sirajul Haq, Ani Shabri, Muhammad Imran Qureshi, Muhammad Sabir, Waqas Nazeer and Shin Min Kang. Their work appears in journals such as Ain Shams Engineering Journal, IEEE Access, BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation and Carpathian Journal of Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact