Muhammad Azim Khan
- Plant Science top 10%
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Soil Science
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Co-authors
- K. B. MarwatRobert E. BlackshawAbdul Mateen KhattakIjaz Ahmad KhanHabib AhmadGul HassanShujaul Mulk KhanZeeshan Ahmad
- Topics
- Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (6 papers)Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (3 papers)Agricultural Science and Fertilization (3 papers)
In The Last Decade
Muhammad Azim Khan
21 papers receiving 261 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Plant Science 225
- Agronomy and Crop Science 76
- Molecular Biology 50
- Soil Science 49
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 31
Countries citing papers authored by Muhammad Azim Khan
This map shows the geographic impact of Muhammad Azim Khan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Muhammad Azim Khan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Muhammad Azim Khan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Muhammad Azim Khan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Muhammad Azim Khan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Muhammad Azim Khan. The network helps show where Muhammad Azim Khan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Muhammad Azim Khan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Muhammad Azim Khan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Muhammad Azim Khan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Muhammad Azim Khan. Muhammad Azim Khan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | Antimicrobial potentials and phytochemical analysis of desert cotton (A. Javanica) and flax (L. Ustitatissimum). | 6 |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | Evaluating the threshold levels of Neslia apiculata in wheat and its effects on crop yield losses in Swat valley of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. | 1 |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | Integrated weed management in wheat | 29 |
| 14 | WEED FLORA OF CHICKPEA IN DISTRICT LAKKI MARWAT, NWFP | 4 |
| 15 | 26 | |
| 16 | 50 | |
| 17 | 50 | |
| 18 | 26 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Muhammad Azim Khan
Muhammad Azim Khan is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Plant Science and Soil Science, having authored 21 papers that have together received 319 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (6 papers), Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (3 papers) and Agricultural Science and Fertilization (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (76 citations), Plant Science (225 citations) and Soil Science (49 citations). Muhammad Azim Khan has collaborated with scholars based in Pakistan, Czechia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include K. B. Marwat, Robert E. Blackshaw, Abdul Mateen Khattak, Ijaz Ahmad Khan, Habib Ahmad, Gul Hassan, Shujaul Mulk Khan, Zeeshan Ahmad, Naqib Ullah Khan and Muhammad Sajjad Iqbal. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ethnopharmacology, Ecological Indicators and Soil and Tillage Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.