Mugdha Sabale
About
In The Last Decade
Mugdha Sabale
4 papers receiving 599 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Plant Science 506
- Ecology 129
- Molecular Biology 119
- Cell Biology 100
- Soil Science 88
Countries citing papers authored by Mugdha Sabale
This map shows the geographic impact of Mugdha Sabale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mugdha Sabale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mugdha Sabale more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mugdha Sabale
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mugdha Sabale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mugdha Sabale. The network helps show where Mugdha Sabale may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mugdha Sabale
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mugdha Sabale. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mugdha Sabale based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mugdha Sabale. Mugdha Sabale is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 39 | |
| 2 | 35 | |
| 3 | 34 | |
| 4 | Roots Shaping Their Microbiome: Global Hotspots for Microbial Activity breakdown → | 498 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.