Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Practice of Social Research
19897.3k citationsAlan Neustadtl, Earl R. BabbieTeaching Sociologyprofile →
Countries citing papers authored by Earl R. Babbie
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Earl R. Babbie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Earl R. Babbie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Earl R. Babbie more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Earl R. Babbie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Earl R. Babbie. The network helps show where Earl R. Babbie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Earl R. Babbie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Earl R. Babbie.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Earl R. Babbie based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Earl R. Babbie. Earl R. Babbie is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Babbie, Earl R.. (2013). The Practice of Social Research: Fourteenth Edition.5 indexed citations
Babbie, Earl R., et al.. (2007). Adventures in Social Research: Data Analysis Using SPSS 14.0 and 15.0 for Windows.17 indexed citations
4.
Babbie, Earl R., et al.. (2006). Adventures in Social Research with SPSS Student Version: Data Analysis Using SPSS 14.0 and 15.0 for Windows.1 indexed citations
5.
Baxter, Leslie A. & Earl R. Babbie. (2004). Basics of Communication Research.338 indexed citations
6.
Dowdall, George W., et al.. (2003). Adventures in Criminal Justice Research: Data Analysis for Windows 95/98 Using SPSS Version 11.0. SAGE Publications eBooks.1 indexed citations
7.
Babbie, Earl R.. (2000). Índices, escalas y tipologías.1 indexed citations
8.
Babbie, Earl R., et al.. (1998). Adventures in Social Research: Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows. Internet Archive (Internet Archive).7 indexed citations
Babbie, Earl R., et al.. (1995). Adventures in Social Research: Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows/Book and Disk.
11.
Babbie, Earl R., et al.. (1994). The Practice of Social Research. Teaching Sociology. 22(1). 126–126.733 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Maxfield, Michael G. & Earl R. Babbie. (1994). Basics of Research Methods for Criminal Justice and Criminology. Medical Entomology and Zoology.61 indexed citations
13.
Neustadtl, Alan & Earl R. Babbie. (1989). The Practice of Social Research. Teaching Sociology. 17(4). 499–499.7286 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Babbie, Earl R., et al.. (1984). Apple Logo for teachers. Medical Entomology and Zoology.
15.
Babbie, Earl R.. (1982). Understanding Sociology: A Context for Action. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
16.
Turk, Theresa & Earl R. Babbie. (1982). Sociology: An Introduction. Teaching Sociology. 9(2). 214–214.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.