Morten E. Moeller
Impact in
- Aging top 10%
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Papers in
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 6
-
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction 2
- Co-authors
- Kim Rewitz (6 shared papers)E. Thomas Danielsen (5 shared papers)Michael B. O’Connor (3 shared papers)Rachel Herder (2 shared papers)Amalie Thit (2 shared papers)Per Meyer Jepsen (2 shared papers)Biljana Mojsoska (3 shared papers)Julie L. Hentze (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Current topics in developmental biology (1 paper)Current Biology (1 paper)PLoS Genetics (1 paper)Development (1 paper)Developmental Cell (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- DenmarkUnited StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Morten E. Moeller
10 papers receiving 398 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Aging 23
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 231
- Insect Science 106
- Human-Computer Interaction 31
- Genetics 104
Countries citing papers authored by Morten E. Moeller
This map shows the geographic impact of Morten E. Moeller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Morten E. Moeller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Morten E. Moeller more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Morten E. Moeller
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Morten E. Moeller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Morten E. Moeller. The network helps show where Morten E. Moeller may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Morten E. Moeller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 71 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 70 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 64 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 60 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 45 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 44 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 1 |
About Morten E. Moeller
Morten E. Moeller is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Insect Science and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 10 papers that have together received 402 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (6 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (2 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (2 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (2 papers), Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (1 paper), Plant Molecular Biology Research (1 paper) and Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (23 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (231 citations), Insect Science (106 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (31 citations) and Genetics (104 citations). Morten E. Moeller has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Kim Rewitz, E. Thomas Danielsen, Michael B. O’Connor, Rachel Herder, Amalie Thit, Per Meyer Jepsen, Biljana Mojsoska, Julie L. Hentze, James T. Warren and Lawrence I. Gilbert. Their work appears in journals such as Current topics in developmental biology, Current Biology, PLoS Genetics, Development and Developmental Cell.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.