Monte Madsen

491 total citations
6 papers, 342 citations indexed

About

Monte Madsen is a scholar working on Surgery, Internal Medicine and Emergency Medical Services. According to data from OpenAlex, Monte Madsen has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 342 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Surgery, 6 papers in Internal Medicine and 6 papers in Emergency Medical Services. Recurrent topics in Monte Madsen's work include Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (6 papers), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (6 papers) and Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (6 papers). Monte Madsen is often cited by papers focused on Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (6 papers), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (6 papers) and Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (6 papers). Monte Madsen collaborates with scholars based in United States, India and Ireland. Monte Madsen's co-authors include Kathleen Gibson, Nick Morrison, Michael Vasquez, Andrew D. Jones, Daniel Cher, Robert A. Weiss, Raghu Kolluri, Robert J. Min, Derek J. McLean and José I. Almeida and has published in prestigious journals such as Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease, Journal of Vascular Surgery Venous and Lymphatic Disorders and Vascular and Endovascular Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Monte Madsen

6 papers receiving 314 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Monte Madsen United States	6	341	320	173	67	28	6	342
Anke Biemans Netherlands	8	366 1.1×	356 1.1×	111 0.6×	101 1.5×	39 1.4×	12	371
Craig Nesbitt United Kingdom	5	326 1.0×	302 0.9×	94 0.5×	96 1.4×	35 1.3×	8	337
James Lawson Germany	8	270 0.8×	257 0.8×	124 0.7×	72 1.1×	24 0.9×	11	274
Steve Elias United States	7	241 0.7×	227 0.7×	77 0.4×	74 1.1×	29 1.0×	16	248
Jens Alm Germany	6	430 1.3×	416 1.3×	180 1.0×	131 2.0×	41 1.5×	8	433
Pascal Pronk Netherlands	7	329 1.0×	303 0.9×	98 0.6×	109 1.6×	44 1.6×	9	332
Anthony Mekako United Kingdom	9	502 1.5×	470 1.5×	133 0.8×	200 3.0×	71 2.5×	13	516
Uldis Maurins Germany	6	433 1.3×	415 1.3×	100 0.6×	140 2.1×	77 2.8×	7	453
F. Pannier Germany	4	298 0.9×	277 0.9×	62 0.4×	40 0.6×	47 1.7×	7	310
Rajagopalan Ravi United States	7	262 0.8×	201 0.6×	53 0.3×	93 1.4×	31 1.1×	9	326

Countries citing papers authored by Monte Madsen

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Monte Madsen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Monte Madsen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Monte Madsen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Monte Madsen

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Monte Madsen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Monte Madsen. The network helps show where Monte Madsen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Monte Madsen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Monte Madsen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Monte Madsen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Monte Madsen. Monte Madsen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Gibson, Kathleen, Nick Morrison, Raghu Kolluri, et al.. (2018). Twenty-four month results from a randomized trial of cyanoacrylate closure versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of incompetent great saphenous veins. Journal of Vascular Surgery Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. 6(5). 606–613. 64 indexed citations

2.

Morrison, Nick, Raghu Kolluri, Michael Vasquez, et al.. (2018). Comparison of cyanoacrylate closure and radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of incompetent great saphenous veins: 36-Month outcomes of the VeClose randomized controlled trial. Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease. 34(6). 380–390. 59 indexed citations

3.

Morrison, Nick, Kathleen Gibson, Michael Vasquez, et al.. (2017). VeClose trial 12-month outcomes of cyanoacrylate closure versus radiofrequency ablation for incompetent great saphenous veins. Journal of Vascular Surgery Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. 5(3). 321–330. 83 indexed citations

4.

Kolluri, Raghu, Kathleen Gibson, Daniel Cher, et al.. (2016). Roll-in phase analysis of clinical study of cyanoacrylate closure for incompetent great saphenous veins. Journal of Vascular Surgery Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. 4(4). 407–415. 30 indexed citations

5.

Min, Robert J., José I. Almeida, Derek J. McLean, Monte Madsen, & R. Raabe. (2012). Novel vein closure procedure using a proprietary cyanoacrylate adhesive: 30-day swine model results. Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease. 27(8). 398–403. 38 indexed citations

6.

Almeida, José I., et al.. (2011). Cyanoacrylate Adhesive for the Closure of Truncal Veins. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 45(7). 631–635. 68 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact