Monique C. Haak
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 0.5%
- Epidemiology top 2%
- Surgery top 5%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 0.5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- J. M. G. van VugtDick OepkesEnrico LoprioreEva PajkrtNico A. BlomMargot M. BartelingsJaap M. MiddeldorpAdriana C. Gittenberger–de Groot
- Topics
- Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (78 papers)Congenital Heart Disease Studies (69 papers)Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (58 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONENeuroImage
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Monique C. Haak
181 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 1.9k
- Epidemiology 1.4k
- Surgery 957
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 750
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 597
Countries citing papers authored by Monique C. Haak
This map shows the geographic impact of Monique C. Haak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Monique C. Haak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Monique C. Haak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Monique C. Haak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Monique C. Haak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Monique C. Haak. The network helps show where Monique C. Haak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Monique C. Haak
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Monique C. Haak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Monique C. Haak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Monique C. Haak. Monique C. Haak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 25 | |
| 17 | [The standard mid-pregnancy anomaly scan in the Netherlands: what is its effect?] | 2 |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Monique C. Haak
Monique C. Haak is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Epidemiology, having authored 191 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (78 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (69 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (58 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (750 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (1.9k citations) and Epidemiology (1.4k citations). Monique C. Haak has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include J. M. G. van Vugt, Dick Oepkes, Enrico Lopriore, Eva Pajkrt, Nico A. Blom, Margot M. Bartelings, Jaap M. Middeldorp, Adriana C. Gittenberger–de Groot, Femke Slaghekke and Christianne J.M. de Groot. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and NeuroImage.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.