Monika Hampl

2.2k citations
85 papers · 1.6k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Monika Hampl

72 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Monika Hampl
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 338
  • Epidemiology 761
  • Reproductive Medicine 117
  • Otorhinolaryngology 50
  • Surgery 440
Replace Tak‐Hong Cheung with:
Tak‐Hong Cheung Hong Kong
Katherine A. Shera United States
Godfrey E. Wilson United Kingdom
Ulla Hørding Denmark
Keith W.K. Lo Hong Kong
Leslie A. Walton United States
Margriet J. G. Löwik Netherlands
Anke Bakker United States
Miriam Reuschenbach Germany
Monika Hampl relative to Tak‐Hong Cheung Hong Kong Tak‐Hong Cheung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Tak‐Hong Cheung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Monika Hampl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Monika Hampl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Monika Hampl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Monika Hampl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Monika Hampl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Monika Hampl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Monika Hampl. The network helps show where Monika Hampl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Monika Hampl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Monika Hampl Line = papers co-authored together Monika Hampl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013309
2 2006131
3 2008131
4 2008105
5 200666
6 200258
7 201650
8 201746
9 199939
10 199736
11 200635
12 200131
13 201630
14 200927
15
Loss of heterozygosity accumulation in primary breast carcinomas and additionally in corresponding distant metastases is associated with poor outcome.
199925
16 201024
17 201424
18 201323
19 201322
20 200321

About Monika Hampl

Monika Hampl is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery, Oncology and Dermatology, having authored 85 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (34 papers), Genital Health and Disease (14 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (12 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (6 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (5 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (4 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (4 papers) and Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (338 citations), Epidemiology (761 citations), Reproductive Medicine (117 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (50 citations) and Surgery (440 citations). Monika Hampl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Hans Bender, Nicolas Wentzensen, Daniel Rein, Peer Hantschmann, Peter Hillemanns, Juergen A. Hampl, Wolfgang Michels, Howard Alan Fine, Paul S. Albert and Jeongwu Lee. Their work appears in journals such as JDDG Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft, Gynecologic Oncology, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Cancers and International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact