Mohd Fareed

27 papers receiving 585 citations

Peers

Mohd Fareed
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Internal Medicine 17
  • Genetics 48
  • Neurology 62
  • Epidemiology 136
  • Sensory Systems 19
Replace Ginevra Biino with:
Ginevra Biino Italy
Ksenija Geršak Slovenia
Klaus Lauer Germany
Clara Grazia Chisari Italy
Maria Bäärnhielm Sweden
Luiz Alberto Bacheschi Brazil
Stephen M. Canfield United States
Elisabeth Andersen Denmark
Longda Jiang Australia
Mohd Fareed relative to Ginevra Biino Italy Ginevra Biino's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12.4×
Ginevra Biino · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mohd Fareed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mohd Fareed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mohd Fareed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mohd Fareed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mohd Fareed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mohd Fareed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mohd Fareed. The network helps show where Mohd Fareed may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mohd Fareed, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mohd Fareed Line = papers co-authored together Mohd Fareed links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201386
2 200281
3 201664
4 201254
5 201442
6
Prevalence of Red-Green Color Vision Defects among Muslim Males and Females of Manipur, India.
201341
7 201540
8 201435
9 201331
10 201624
11 200020
12 201217
13 201610
14 201210
15
Recruitment of Ischemic Stroke Patients in Clinical trials in General Practice and Implications for Generalizability of Results.
20128
16 20148
17 20227
18
Prevalence of Red-Green Color Vision Defects among Muslim Males and Females of Manipur, India
20136
19 20225
20 20215

About Mohd Fareed

Mohd Fareed is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Hematology and Physiology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 612 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (4 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (4 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (3 papers), Blood groups and transfusion (3 papers), Iron Metabolism and Disorders (2 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (2 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (2 papers) and Connexins and lens biology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (17 citations), Genetics (48 citations), Neurology (62 citations), Epidemiology (136 citations) and Sensory Systems (19 citations). Mohd Fareed has collaborated with scholars based in India and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mohammad Afzal, Chandrasekharan Nair Kesavachandran, Ritul Kamal, Manoj Kumar Pathak, Vipin Bihari, Adnan I. Qureshi, Srivastava Ak, L. Nelson Hopkins, Zulfiqar Ali and José I. Suárez. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, American Journal of Human Biology, Scientific Reports, Journal of Endovascular Therapy and Annals of Human Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact