M.M. Al-Eknah
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
- Food Science top 10%
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
- Genetics
- Small Animals top 10%
- Co-authors
- D.E. NoakesI.M. GhoneimA.M. HomeidaSabry M. El-BahrMahmoud FayezA GalilMohamed MandourAbdulla Al‐Taher
- Topics
- Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (26 papers)Animal Diversity and Health Studies (20 papers)Sperm and Testicular Function (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- Saudi ArabiaUnited KingdomEgypt
In The Last Decade
M.M. Al-Eknah
33 papers receiving 189 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Agronomy and Crop Science 140
- Food Science 93
- Reproductive Medicine 50
- Genetics 42
- Small Animals 33
Countries citing papers authored by M.M. Al-Eknah
This map shows the geographic impact of M.M. Al-Eknah's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.M. Al-Eknah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.M. Al-Eknah more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M.M. Al-Eknah
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.M. Al-Eknah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.M. Al-Eknah. The network helps show where M.M. Al-Eknah may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M.M. Al-Eknah
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M.M. Al-Eknah. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M.M. Al-Eknah based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M.M. Al-Eknah. M.M. Al-Eknah is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | Endometrial biopsy technique and histopathological findings of endometritis in camels (Camelus dromedarius) | 2 |
| 5 | IMPROVING THE QUALITY AND RELEVANCE OF RESEARCH OUTPUTS THROUGHOUT PUBLISHING IN SCHOLARLY JOURNALS | 0 |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | Effect of extenders on motility and viability of chilled-stored camel spermatozoa (Camelus dromedarius). | 4 |
| 10 | Effect of some extenders and enzymes on semen viscosity and sperm viability in dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius). | 7 |
| 11 | Uterine histopathological findings of infertile female camels (Camelus dromedarius). | 4 |
| 12 | Comparative milking performance of three types of Saudi camels (Camelus dromedarius). | 20 |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About M.M. Al-Eknah
M.M. Al-Eknah is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Food Science and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 35 papers that have together received 206 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (26 papers), Animal Diversity and Health Studies (20 papers) and Sperm and Testicular Function (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (140 citations), Reproductive Medicine (50 citations) and Food Science (93 citations). M.M. Al-Eknah has collaborated with scholars based in Saudi Arabia, United Kingdom and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include D.E. Noakes, I.M. Ghoneim, A.M. Homeida, Sabry M. El-Bahr, Mahmoud Fayez, A Galil, Mohamed Mandour, Abdulla Al‐Taher, Khalid A. Al-Busadah and Stephen D. Carrington. Their work appears in journals such as Reproduction, Journal of Proteome Research and Theriogenology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.