Citations per year, relative to M.J. Wentzel M.J. Wentzel (= 1×)
peers
Charlotte Schmidt Skov
Countries citing papers authored by M.J. Wentzel
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of M.J. Wentzel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.J. Wentzel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.J. Wentzel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.J. Wentzel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.J. Wentzel. The network helps show where M.J. Wentzel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M.J. Wentzel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M.J. Wentzel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M.J. Wentzel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M.J. Wentzel. M.J. Wentzel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Jong, Nienke Beerlage-de, Olga Kulyk, M.J. Wentzel, Harri Oinas‐Kukkonen, & Julia E.W.C. van Gemert‐Pijnen. (2015). 'Sorting out' the PPQ: A mixed-methods approach to evaluate Perceived Persuasiveness Questionnaire constructs.2 indexed citations
2.
Wentzel, M.J. & Julia E.W.C. van Gemert‐Pijnen. (2014). Antibiotic Information App for Nurses. University of Twente Research Information. 174–179.6 indexed citations
3.
Wentzel, M.J., et al.. (2014). Understanding eHealth use from a Persuasive System Design Perspective An Antibiotic Information Application for Nurses. 6. 210–219.3 indexed citations
4.
Wentzel, M.J., Nienke Beerlage-de Jong, Floor Sieverink, & Julia E.W.C. van Gemert‐Pijnen. (2014). Slimmer eHealth ontwikkelen en implementeren met de CeHRes Roadmap. University of Twente Research Information.3 indexed citations
5.
Jong, Nienke Beerlage-de, M.J. Wentzel, Saskia M. Kelders, Harri Oinas‐Kukkonen, & Julia E.W.C. van Gemert‐Pijnen. (2014). Perceived persuasiveness questionnaire. Evaluation of Perceived Persuasiveness Constructs by Combining User Tests and Expert Assessments.1 indexed citations
6.
Jong, Nienke Beerlage-de, M.J. Wentzel, Saskia M. Kelders, Harri Oinas‐Kukkonen, & Julia E.W.C. van Gemert‐Pijnen. (2014). Evaluation of Perceived Persuasiveness Constructs by Combining User Tests and Expert Assessments. 7–15.5 indexed citations
7.
Dyk, Liezl Van, et al.. (2012). BUSINESS MODELS FOR SUSTAINED EHEALTH IMPLEMENTATION: LESSONS FROM TWO CONTINENTS. SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University).5 indexed citations
8.
Wentzel, M.J., et al.. (2012). Co-creation with Stakeholders: A Web 2.0 Antibiotic Stewardship Program. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 196–202.5 indexed citations
9.
Wentzel, M.J., Joyce Karreman, & Julia E.W.C. van Gemert‐Pijnen. (2011). Towards an Internet-based Infectious Disease Management Platform to Increase Patient Safety. University of Twente Research Information. 47–50.2 indexed citations
10.
Pillay, U., et al.. (2011). FIFA 2010 World Cup Legacy Audit Final Report.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.