M.-J. Terrier-Lacombe
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Oncology top 10%
- Neurology top 5%
- Surgery top 10%
- Co-authors
- Odile OberlinHélène PacquementMarie‐Cécile Le DeleyLaurence BrugièresGeorges DelsolC RodaryG ContessoA. Rey
- Topics
- Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (17 papers)Testicular diseases and treatments (8 papers)Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
M.-J. Terrier-Lacombe
29 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 664
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 552
- Oncology 353
- Neurology 320
- Surgery 281
Countries citing papers authored by M.-J. Terrier-Lacombe
This map shows the geographic impact of M.-J. Terrier-Lacombe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.-J. Terrier-Lacombe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.-J. Terrier-Lacombe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M.-J. Terrier-Lacombe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.-J. Terrier-Lacombe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.-J. Terrier-Lacombe. The network helps show where M.-J. Terrier-Lacombe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M.-J. Terrier-Lacombe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M.-J. Terrier-Lacombe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M.-J. Terrier-Lacombe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M.-J. Terrier-Lacombe. M.-J. Terrier-Lacombe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 33 | |
| 2 | 63 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 44 | |
| 5 | 117 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 145 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | [Desmoplastic small round cell tumors in adults: a new entity]. | 3 |
| 12 | 38 | |
| 13 | 71 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 98 | |
| 16 | 67 | |
| 17 | 66 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 32 |
About M.-J. Terrier-Lacombe
M.-J. Terrier-Lacombe is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Rheumatology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (17 papers), Testicular diseases and treatments (8 papers) and Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (664 citations), Neurology (320 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (552 citations). M.-J. Terrier-Lacombe has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Odile Oberlin, Hélène Pacquement, Marie‐Cécile Le Deley, Laurence Brugières, Georges Delsol, C Rodary, G Contesso, A. Rey, E. Quintana and Jean‐Louis Habrand. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Blood and The Journal of Urology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.