Mithya Lewis‐Newby

20 papers receiving 436 citations

Peers

Mithya Lewis‐Newby
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 246
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 162
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 122
  • Emergency Medicine 112
  • General Health Professions 83
Replace Lillian L. Emlet with:
Lillian L. Emlet United States
Dorothy M. Beke United States
Melinda Hamilton United States
Tara R. Lang United States
AnnMarie Papa United States
Catherine Haut United States
Jennifer L. Rosenthal United States
Ginger Schafer Wlody United States
Laura K. Rock United States
David I. Rappaport United States
Mithya Lewis‐Newby relative to Lillian L. Emlet United States Lillian L. Emlet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Lillian L. Emlet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mithya Lewis‐Newby

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mithya Lewis‐Newby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mithya Lewis‐Newby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mithya Lewis‐Newby more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mithya Lewis‐Newby

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mithya Lewis‐Newby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mithya Lewis‐Newby. The network helps show where Mithya Lewis‐Newby may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mithya Lewis‐Newby

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mithya Lewis‐Newby. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mithya Lewis‐Newby based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mithya Lewis‐Newby. Mithya Lewis‐Newby is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 5
2 0
3 1
4 1
5 0
6 3
7 0
8 6
9 5
10 10
11 4
12 3
13 1
14
An Official American Thoracic Society Policy Statement: Managing Conscientious Objections in Intensive Care Medicine
5
15 33
16 13
17 182
18 5
19 33
20 73

About Mithya Lewis‐Newby

Mithya Lewis‐Newby is a scholar working on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Emergency Medical Services and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 25 papers that have together received 451 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (9 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (8 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (122 citations), Emergency Medicine (112 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (246 citations). Mithya Lewis‐Newby has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Robert D. Truog, Deborah E. Sellers, Elaine C. Meyer, Jeffrey P. Burns, J. Randall Curtis, Jennifer Reid, Kimberly Stone, Linda Quan, Julie C. Brown and Kristy Seidel. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine and PEDIATRICS.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026