Mithat Durak

32 papers receiving 828 citations

Peers

Mithat Durak
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Applied Psychology 171
  • Social Psychology 309
  • Clinical Psychology 308
  • Communication 81
  • Sociology and Political Science 427
Replace Emre Şenol-Durak with:
Emre Şenol-Durak Türkiye
Özkan Çıkrıkçı Türkiye
Kaitlin M. Flannery United States
Sara Malo Spain
Ting Kin Ng Hong Kong
Matthew Draper United States
Manuel Martí Vilar Spain
Yue Liang China
Lisa S. Schreindorfer United States
P. Priscilla Lui United States
Mithat Durak relative to Emre Şenol-Durak Türkiye Emre Şenol-Durak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Emre Şenol-Durak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mithat Durak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mithat Durak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mithat Durak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mithat Durak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mithat Durak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mithat Durak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mithat Durak. The network helps show where Mithat Durak may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Mithat Durak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mithat Durak Line = papers co-authored together Mithat Durak links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010255
2 2016122
3 201072
4 201065
5 200645
6 201944
7 201441
8 201634
9 201027
10 201624
11 201322
12
The role of self-esteem in Internet addiction: a comparison between Turkish, Polish and Ukrainian samples
201622
13 201917
14 202314
15 201613
16 202211
17 201110
18 202110
19 20117
20 20114

About Mithat Durak

Mithat Durak is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Education and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 882 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (11 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (7 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (6 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (5 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers) and Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (171 citations), Social Psychology (309 citations), Clinical Psychology (308 citations), Communication (81 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (427 citations). Mithat Durak has collaborated with scholars based in Türkiye, Poland and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Emre Şenol-Durak, Tülin Gençöz, Agata Błachnio, Aneta Przepiórka, Elvis Mazzoni, Menachem Ben‐Ezra, Martina Benvenuti, Gwendolyn Seidman, Adela Magdalena Ciobanu and Michail N. Giannakos. Their work appears in journals such as Social Indicators Research, European Journal of Psychological Assessment, Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation and Psychiatry Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact