Mitchell R. Goldsworthy
- Neurology top 0.5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Rehabilitation top 2%
- Physiology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Michael C. RiddingJulia B. PitcherBrenton HordacreAshleigh E. SmithJohn G. SemmlerUlf ZiemannFlorian Müller‐DahlhausNigel C. Rogasch
- Topics
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (34 papers)Muscle activation and electromyography studies (13 papers)EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Mitchell R. Goldsworthy
44 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Neurology 1.1k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 927
- Biomedical Engineering 322
- Rehabilitation 200
- Physiology 189
Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell R. Goldsworthy
This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell R. Goldsworthy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell R. Goldsworthy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell R. Goldsworthy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell R. Goldsworthy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell R. Goldsworthy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell R. Goldsworthy. The network helps show where Mitchell R. Goldsworthy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mitchell R. Goldsworthy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mitchell R. Goldsworthy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mitchell R. Goldsworthy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mitchell R. Goldsworthy. Mitchell R. Goldsworthy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 65 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 38 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 30 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 145 | |
| 16 | 30 | |
| 17 | 84 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 50 | |
| 20 | 91 |
About Mitchell R. Goldsworthy
Mitchell R. Goldsworthy is a scholar working on Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (34 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (13 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (1.1k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (927 citations) and Rehabilitation (200 citations). Mitchell R. Goldsworthy has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Michael C. Ridding, Julia B. Pitcher, Brenton Hordacre, Ashleigh E. Smith, John G. Semmler, Ulf Ziemann, Florian Müller‐Dahlhaus, Nigel C. Rogasch, Ann‐Maree Vallence and Nicolette A. Hodyl. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurophysiology, Scientific Reports and Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.