Mitchell Hobbs
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Communication top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Stephen OwenDavid McKnightSuzanne McLarenSteven ThreadgoldPam NilanDavid SchlosbergTaberez Ahmed NeyaziAudrey Yue
- Topics
- Media Studies and Communication (7 papers)Social Media and Politics (5 papers)Public Relations and Crisis Communication (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomSingapore
In The Last Decade
Mitchell Hobbs
20 papers receiving 399 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Sociology and Political Science 203
- Clinical Psychology 123
- Gender Studies 112
- Communication 107
- Social Psychology 63
Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell Hobbs
This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell Hobbs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell Hobbs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell Hobbs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell Hobbs
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell Hobbs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell Hobbs. The network helps show where Mitchell Hobbs may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mitchell Hobbs
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mitchell Hobbs. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mitchell Hobbs based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mitchell Hobbs. Mitchell Hobbs is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 205 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | Communication, New Media and Everyday Life | 4 |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | On discourse and representation: reflections on Michel Foucault's contribution to the study of mass media | 5 |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | Reflections on the reality of the Iraq wars: the demise of Baudrillard's search for truth? | 1 |
| 20 | Post-praia progress toward tenure security and decentralization: Review of CILSS-member country legislative reforms | 1 |
About Mitchell Hobbs
Mitchell Hobbs is a scholar working on Communication, Gender Studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 419 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Studies and Communication (7 papers), Social Media and Politics (5 papers) and Public Relations and Crisis Communication (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (107 citations), Gender Studies (112 citations) and Clinical Psychology (123 citations). Mitchell Hobbs has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Owen, David McKnight, Suzanne McLaren, Steven Threadgold, Pam Nilan, David Schlosberg, Taberez Ahmed Neyazi, Audrey Yue, Paul Allen and D. J. Nicholas. Their work appears in journals such as Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, Public Relations Review and Alcohol and Alcoholism.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.