Mitchell F. Reiter

454 total citations
11 papers, 332 citations indexed

About

Mitchell F. Reiter is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Mitchell F. Reiter has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 332 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Surgery, 8 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 2 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Mitchell F. Reiter's work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (7 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (6 papers) and Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis (2 papers). Mitchell F. Reiter is often cited by papers focused on Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (7 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (6 papers) and Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis (2 papers). Mitchell F. Reiter collaborates with scholars based in United States, Spain and Sweden. Mitchell F. Reiter's co-authors include Michael J. Vives, Scott D. Boden, Noshir A. Langrana, Saad B. Chaudhary, Shyam Kishan, Kathryn Higgins, Lawrence G. Kushins, Mark C. Reilly, Brian T. Zafonte and Frank J. Eismont and has published in prestigious journals such as Spine, The Spine Journal and Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques.

In The Last Decade

Mitchell F. Reiter

11 papers receiving 319 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mitchell F. Reiter United States	7	282	210	36	25	19	11	332
Kin Cheung Mak Hong Kong	7	249 0.9×	85 0.4×	14 0.4×	14 0.6×	22 1.2×	13	292
Bharat R. Dave India	12	298 1.1×	240 1.1×	27 0.8×	46 1.8×	13 0.7×	55	346
Yu-Hsien Kao Taiwan	12	449 1.6×	297 1.4×	28 0.8×	34 1.4×	34 1.8×	24	475
Mootaz Shousha Germany	12	363 1.3×	226 1.1×	24 0.7×	18 0.7×	22 1.2×	34	383
Chien Lin Liu Taiwan	9	354 1.3×	284 1.4×	17 0.5×	35 1.4×	8 0.4×	15	391
Peter M. Formby United States	9	306 1.1×	109 0.5×	29 0.8×	51 2.0×	24 1.3×	24	376
Juan J. Zamorano Chile	10	296 1.0×	237 1.1×	29 0.8×	20 0.8×	24 1.3×	25	362
Sinan Kahraman Türkiye	8	303 1.1×	159 0.8×	34 0.9×	11 0.4×	9 0.5×	24	320
J. Michael Simpson United States	6	377 1.3×	316 1.5×	10 0.3×	59 2.4×	15 0.8×	10	421

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell F. Reiter

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell F. Reiter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell F. Reiter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell F. Reiter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell F. Reiter

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell F. Reiter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell F. Reiter. The network helps show where Mitchell F. Reiter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mitchell F. Reiter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mitchell F. Reiter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mitchell F. Reiter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mitchell F. Reiter. Mitchell F. Reiter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Reiter, Mitchell F., et al.. (2025). Postoperative Ketorolac Administration and Pseudoarthrosis Following Lumbar Spinal Fusion. Spine. 51(2). 85–91. 1 indexed citations

2.

Reiter, Mitchell F., et al.. (2020). The Significance of Metal Sensitivity Testing in Instrumented Orthopaedic Surgery. 8(3). e19.00039–e19.00039. 1 indexed citations

3.

Reiter, Mitchell F., et al.. (2018). The effect of surgically implanted metallic bullet fragments on the intervertebral disc using a canine model☆. The Spine Journal. 19(4). 755–761. 5 indexed citations

4.

Vives, Michael J., et al.. (2007). Use of stand-up magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of a cervicothoracic injury in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis. The Spine Journal. 8(4). 678–682. 6 indexed citations

5.

Chaudhary, Saad B., et al.. (2007). Postoperative Spinal Wound Infections and Postprocedural Diskitis. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 30(5). 441–451. 98 indexed citations

6.

Vives, Michael J., et al.. (2006). Methemoglobinemia After Fiberoptic Intubation in a Patient With an Unstable Cervical Fracture. Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques. 19(4). 302–304. 8 indexed citations

7.

Kishan, Shyam, Michael J. Vives, & Mitchell F. Reiter. (2005). Timing of Surgery Following Spinal Cord Injury. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 28(1). 11–19. 20 indexed citations

8.

Higgins, Kathryn, et al.. (2003). . Spine. 28(14). 1540–1547. 6 indexed citations

9.

Langrana, Noshir A., et al.. (2003). Biomechanical Effects of Unipedicular Vertebroplasty on Intact Vertebrae. Spine. 28(14). 1540–1547. 70 indexed citations

10.

Langrana, Noshir A., et al.. (2002). Acute Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures. Spine. 27(5). 498–508. 53 indexed citations

11.

Reiter, Mitchell F. & Scott D. Boden. (1998). Inflammatory Disorders of the Cervical Spine. Spine. 23(24). 2755–2766. 64 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact