Miriam Smith
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender Politics and Representation
- Public Administration top 10%
Papers in
-
- Canadian Identity and History 10
- Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies 3
-
- Political Systems and Governance 3
- Canadian Policy and Governance 3
- Social Policy and Reform Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Michael Orsini (1 shared paper)John Grundy (3 shared papers)François Rocher (2 shared papers)Paul Pierson (1 shared paper)Suzanne Delbanco (1 shared paper)Nick J. Mulé (1 shared paper)Amy B. Bernstein (1 shared paper)Surendra Gera (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Canadian Journal of Political Science (4 papers)Canadian Public Policy (2 papers)Social & Legal Studies (2 papers)Politics & Society (1 paper)Social movement studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Miriam Smith
38 papers receiving 615 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Gender Studies 142
- Public Administration 47
- Political Science and International Relations 256
- Social Psychology 222
- Law 82
Countries citing papers authored by Miriam Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Miriam Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miriam Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miriam Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Miriam Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miriam Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miriam Smith. The network helps show where Miriam Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Miriam Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 76 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 70 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 64 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 47 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 31 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 31 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 28 | |
| 9 | 1993 | 26 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 26 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 24 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 22 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 20 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 17 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 15 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 14 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 14 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 13 | |
| 19 | 2002 | 12 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 12 |
About Miriam Smith
Miriam Smith is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology, Law and Gender Studies, having authored 38 papers that have together received 719 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (11 papers), Canadian Identity and History (10 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (8 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (4 papers), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (3 papers), Political Systems and Governance (3 papers), Canadian Policy and Governance (3 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (142 citations), Public Administration (47 citations), Political Science and International Relations (256 citations), Social Psychology (222 citations) and Law (82 citations). Miriam Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Michael Orsini, John Grundy, François Rocher, Paul Pierson, Suzanne Delbanco, Nick J. Mulé, Amy B. Bernstein, Surendra Gera and Thomas H. Dial. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Political Science, Canadian Public Policy, Social & Legal Studies, Politics & Society and Social movement studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.