Miranda Sertić

506 citations
32 papers · 405 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Miranda Sertić

32 papers receiving 397 citations

Peers

Miranda Sertić
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Electrochemistry 55
  • Biotechnology 70
  • Analytical Chemistry 68
  • Bioengineering 39
  • Pharmacology 42
Replace Miloš Petković with:
Miloš Petković Serbia
Natalia Miękus Poland
Mahsa Motshakeri New Zealand
Xu Ji China
J. T. Maclachlan United Kingdom
Ha‐Jeong Kwon South Korea
Yichao Wu China
Maoshan Wang China
Ying‐Zi Jiang China
Miranda Sertić relative to Miloš Petković Serbia Miloš Petković's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Miloš Petković · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Miranda Sertić

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Miranda Sertić's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miranda Sertić with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miranda Sertić more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Miranda Sertić

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miranda Sertić. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miranda Sertić. The network helps show where Miranda Sertić may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Miranda Sertić, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Miranda Sertić Line = papers co-authored together Miranda Sertić links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201461
2 201252
3 201347
4 201636
5 202227
6 202019
7 201517
8 202215
9 202014
10 201213
11 201612
12 20199
13 20239
14 20129
15 20208
16 20228
17 20247
18 20237
19 20146
20 20235

About Miranda Sertić

Miranda Sertić is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biotechnology, Plant Science and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 32 papers that have together received 405 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Metabolism and Applications (6 papers), Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies (6 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (5 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (3 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (3 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (3 papers) and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrochemistry (55 citations), Biotechnology (70 citations), Analytical Chemistry (68 citations), Bioengineering (39 citations) and Pharmacology (42 citations). Miranda Sertić has collaborated with scholars based in Croatia, Austria and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Biljana Nigović, Ana Mornar, Tajana Silovski, Slaven Crnković, Maja Šegvić Klarić, Mila Lovrić, Sándor Kocsubé́, Daniela Amidžić Klarić, Domagoj Kifer and Daniela Jakšić. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Pharmaceutica, Molecules, Food Chemistry, Food Analytical Methods and Pharmaceuticals.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact