Minta Thomas

1.0k total citations
8 papers, 52 citations indexed

About

Minta Thomas is a scholar working on Oncology, Molecular Biology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Minta Thomas has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 52 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Oncology, 3 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Minta Thomas's work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (4 papers), Machine Learning in Bioinformatics (3 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (3 papers). Minta Thomas is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (4 papers), Machine Learning in Bioinformatics (3 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (3 papers). Minta Thomas collaborates with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Netherlands. Minta Thomas's co-authors include Kris De Brabanter, Bart De Moor, Bart De Moor, Johan A. K. Suykens, Yu‐Ru Su, Elisabeth F.P. Peterse, Yi Li, Ann G. Zauber, Douglas A. Corley and Lori C. Sakoda and has published in prestigious journals such as BMC Bioinformatics, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology and Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology.

In The Last Decade

Minta Thomas

6 papers receiving 44 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Minta Thomas United States	4	15	11	10	8	7	8	52
Yuanhan Mo United Kingdom	4	28 1.9×	2 0.2×	17 1.7×	4 0.5×	7 1.0×	7	91
Chirag Doshi United States	5	19 1.3×	13 1.2×	6 0.6×	10 1.3×	11 1.6×	17	98
Luca Lianas Italy	5	17 1.1×	2 0.2×	7 0.7×	10 1.3×	12 1.7×	16	51
Jinyi Ho Singapore	4	36 2.4×	4 0.4×	34 3.4×	4 0.5×	6 0.9×	6	282
Kendrick Boyd United States	4	45 3.0×	4 0.4×	4 0.4×	2 0.3×	16 2.3×	4	84
Samuel Chapman United States	5	54 3.6×	31 2.8×	18 1.8×	16 2.0×	18 2.6×	7	113
Milad Sikaroudi Canada	5	63 4.2×	9 0.8×	22 2.2×	3 0.4×	10 1.4×	5	90
Celeste Alves Portugal	4	16 1.1×	6 0.5×	23 2.3×	2 0.3×	2 0.3×	6	92
Dennis Bontempi United States	4	34 2.3×	6 0.5×	7 0.7×	2 0.3×	7 1.0×	10	109

Countries citing papers authored by Minta Thomas

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Minta Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Minta Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Minta Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Minta Thomas

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Minta Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Minta Thomas. The network helps show where Minta Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Minta Thomas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Minta Thomas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Minta Thomas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Minta Thomas. Minta Thomas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Hsu, Li, et al.. (2025). Risk-based screening for early detection of colorectal cancer: an overview. Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology. 80. 102014–102014.

2.

Rosenthal, Elisabeth A., Li Hsu, Minta Thomas, et al.. (2024). Comparing Ancestry Standardization Approaches for a Transancestry Colorectal Cancer Polygenic Risk Score. Genetic Epidemiology. 49(1). e22590–e22590.

3.

Landy, Rebecca, Hormuzd A. Katki, Wen‐Yi Huang, et al.. (2024). Evaluating the Use of Environmental and Polygenic Risk Scores to Inform Colorectal Cancer Risk-Based Surveillance Intervals. Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology. 15(12). e00782–e00782. 2 indexed citations

4.

Meester, Reinier G.S., Elisabeth F.P. Peterse, Ann G. Zauber, et al.. (2023). Risk-Stratified Screening for Colorectal Cancer Using Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Based on Real-World Data. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 21(13). 3415–3423.e29. 11 indexed citations

5.

Thomas, Minta, et al.. (2015). An encryption protocol for end-to-end secure transmission of SMS. 12 indexed citations

6.

Thomas, Minta, Kris De Brabanter, Johan A. K. Suykens, & Bart De Moor. (2014). Predicting breast cancer using an expression values weighted clinical classifier. BMC Bioinformatics. 15(1). 411–411. 7 indexed citations

7.

Thomas, Minta, Kris De Brabanter, & Bart De Moor. (2014). New bandwidth selection criterion for Kernel PCA: Approach to dimensionality reduction and classification problems. BMC Bioinformatics. 15(1). 137–137. 19 indexed citations

8.

Thomas, Minta, Anneleen Daemen, & Bart De Moor. (2014). Maximum Likelihood Estimation of GEVD: Applications in Bioinformatics. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics. 11(4). 673–680. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact