Minke Goldsteen

502 total citations
7 papers, 357 citations indexed

About

Minke Goldsteen is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Minke Goldsteen has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 357 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 3 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Minke Goldsteen's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Family Support in Illness (3 papers) and Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (2 papers). Minke Goldsteen is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Family Support in Illness (3 papers) and Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (2 papers). Minke Goldsteen collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Minke Goldsteen's co-authors include Guy Widdershoven, Huda Huijer Abu‐Saad, Ireen M. Proot, Karen Luker, Harry Crebolder, Cor Spreeuwenberg, Rob Houtepen, Marian Verkerk, B. Oeseburg and Tineke Abma and has published in prestigious journals such as Patient Education and Counseling, Palliative Medicine and Nursing Ethics.

In The Last Decade

Minke Goldsteen

7 papers receiving 311 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Minke Goldsteen Netherlands	6	262	139	123	80	53	7	357
Inger Benkel Sweden	11	257 1.0×	207 1.5×	104 0.8×	63 0.8×	49 0.9×	30	371
Lori P. Montross Thomas United States	5	351 1.3×	267 1.9×	119 1.0×	49 0.6×	62 1.2×	5	462
Julia Strupp Germany	13	329 1.3×	164 1.2×	129 1.0×	121 1.5×	72 1.4×	50	524
Dulce M. Cruz‐Oliver United States	9	229 0.9×	85 0.6×	94 0.8×	46 0.6×	72 1.4×	29	299
Suzanne Mongeau Canada	8	213 0.8×	109 0.8×	69 0.6×	48 0.6×	89 1.7×	18	292
Carol Komaromy United Kingdom	11	202 0.8×	188 1.4×	139 1.1×	60 0.8×	26 0.5×	32	347
Cora Hinds Canada	7	177 0.7×	60 0.4×	153 1.2×	109 1.4×	87 1.6×	7	376
Tina M. Mason United States	10	177 0.7×	168 1.2×	118 1.0×	52 0.7×	32 0.6×	44	370
Leah Rosenberg United States	10	199 0.8×	73 0.5×	100 0.8×	34 0.4×	53 1.0×	40	245
Let Dillen Belgium	8	243 0.9×	256 1.8×	182 1.5×	59 0.7×	18 0.3×	17	419

Countries citing papers authored by Minke Goldsteen

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Minke Goldsteen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Minke Goldsteen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Minke Goldsteen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Minke Goldsteen

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Minke Goldsteen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Minke Goldsteen. The network helps show where Minke Goldsteen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Minke Goldsteen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Minke Goldsteen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Minke Goldsteen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Minke Goldsteen. Minke Goldsteen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Goldsteen, Minke, Tineke Abma, B. Oeseburg, et al.. (2006). WHAT IS IT TO BE A DAUGHTER? IDENTITIES UNDER PRESSURE IN DEMENTIA CARE. Bioethics. 21(1). 1–12. 24 indexed citations

2.

Goldsteen, Minke, Rob Houtepen, Ireen M. Proot, et al.. (2006). What is a good death? Terminally ill patients dealing with normative expectations around death and dying. Patient Education and Counseling. 64(1-3). 378–386. 76 indexed citations

3.

Abma, Tineke, B. Oeseburg, Guy Widdershoven, Minke Goldsteen, & Marian Verkerk. (2005). Two Women with Multiple Sclerosis and Their Caregivers: conflicting normative expectations. Nursing Ethics. 12(5). 479–492. 24 indexed citations

4.

Abma, Tineke, B. Oeseburg, Minke Goldsteen, Guy Widdershoven, & Marian Verkerk. (2005). Two women with multiple sclerosis. Conflicting normative expectations between patients and their caregivers. 3 indexed citations

5.

Proot, Ireen M., et al.. (2004). The needs of terminally ill patients at home: directing one's life, health and things related to beloved others. Palliative Medicine. 18(1). 53–61. 45 indexed citations

6.

Proot, Ireen M., et al.. (2004). The needs of terminally ill patients at home: directing one's life, health and things related to beloved others. Palliative Medicine. 18(1). 53–61. 9 indexed citations

7.

Proot, Ireen M., Huda Huijer Abu‐Saad, Harry Crebolder, et al.. (2003). Vulnerability of family caregivers in terminal palliative care at home; balancing between burden and capacity. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 17(2). 113–121. 176 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact