Ming‐Li Hsieh

514 citations
33 papers · 316 indexed · h-index 11

Ming‐Li Hsieh

31 papers receiving 300 citations

Peers

Ming‐Li Hsieh
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Sociology and Political Science 149
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 30
  • Political Science and International Relations 65
  • Clinical Psychology 38
  • General Health Professions 40
Replace Ilpo Helén with:
Ilpo Helén Finland
Sarah Schulman United States
Matthew Nelson United States
Matthias Wienroth United Kingdom
Denise Meyerson Australia
Vanessa Boulanger United States
John Gray United Kingdom
William R. Hunt United States
Leilei Zeng Canada
Michael F. Weeks United States
Ming‐Li Hsieh relative to Ilpo Helén Finland Ilpo Helén's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Ilpo Helén · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming‐Li Hsieh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming‐Li Hsieh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming‐Li Hsieh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming‐Li Hsieh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming‐Li Hsieh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming‐Li Hsieh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming‐Li Hsieh. The network helps show where Ming‐Li Hsieh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming‐Li Hsieh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming‐Li Hsieh Line = papers co-authored together Ming‐Li Hsieh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20241
4 20243
5 20237
6 202110
7 20213
8 202111
9 20213
10 20192
11 201930
12 201811
13
What Legally Prescribed Functions Tell Us: Role Differences between Adult and Juvenile Probation Officers
20173
14 20166
15 201616
16
Probation Officer Roles: A Statutory Analysis
20154
17 200731
18
A State-Space Airloads Theory for Flexible Airfoils
200614
19 200533
20 200515

About Ming‐Li Hsieh

Ming‐Li Hsieh is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Clinical Psychology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (13 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (12 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (8 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (5 papers), Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (5 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (3 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (3 papers) and Child Welfare and Adoption (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (149 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (30 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (65 citations). Ming‐Li Hsieh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Francis D. Boateng, Horng‐Heng Juang, Yon‐Cheong Wong, Li-Jen Wang, Zachary Hamilton, Cheng‐Keng Chuang, Daniel K. Pryce, David A. Peters, Liqun Cao and Shih‐Tsung Huang. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Urology, Journal of Interpersonal Violence and Journal of Andrology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026