Ming-Jen Chen
Impact in
- Developmental Neuroscience top 10%
- Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
-
- Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Papers in
-
- Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms 1
-
- Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism 3
- Co-authors
- Chien‐Liang Liu (4 shared papers)Yi‐Chiung Hsu (5 shared papers)Jie-Jen Lee (4 shared papers)Shih‐Ping Cheng (4 shared papers)Tung‐Hu Tsai (2 shared papers)Yu-Jen Chen (2 shared papers)Chi-Hsin Lin (3 shared papers)Wen-Chien Huang (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences (2 papers)Scientific Reports (1 paper)Anesthesia & Analgesia (1 paper)Journal of Clinical Medicine (1 paper)Oncotarget (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- TaiwanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ming-Jen Chen
14 papers receiving 651 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Developmental Neuroscience 36
- Cancer Research 100
- Oncology 165
- Psychiatry and Mental health 87
- Molecular Biology 281
Countries citing papers authored by Ming-Jen Chen
This map shows the geographic impact of Ming-Jen Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming-Jen Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming-Jen Chen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ming-Jen Chen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming-Jen Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming-Jen Chen. The network helps show where Ming-Jen Chen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming-Jen Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 161 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 113 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 77 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 66 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 53 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 49 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 22 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 1 |
About Ming-Jen Chen
Ming-Jen Chen is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Surgery, Genetics and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 14 papers that have together received 656 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (3 papers), Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys (2 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (1 paper), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (1 paper), Thyroid Disorders and Treatments (1 paper), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (1 paper), Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms (1 paper) and Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (36 citations), Cancer Research (100 citations), Oncology (165 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (87 citations) and Molecular Biology (281 citations). Ming-Jen Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Chien‐Liang Liu, Yi‐Chiung Hsu, Jie-Jen Lee, Shih‐Ping Cheng, Tung‐Hu Tsai, Yu-Jen Chen, Chi-Hsin Lin, Wen-Chien Huang, J.S.C. Jang and Jinn P. Chu. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Scientific Reports, Anesthesia & Analgesia, Journal of Clinical Medicine and Oncotarget.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.