Minghua Lin

1.0k citations
53 papers · 660 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Minghua Lin

48 papers receiving 570 citations

Peers

Minghua Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Applied Mathematics 561
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 546
  • Geometry and Topology 221
  • Numerical Analysis 98
  • Algebra and Number Theory 47
Replace Takeaki Yamazaki with:
Takeaki Yamazaki Japan
Hwa-Long Gau Taiwan
S.W. Drury Canada
Mónica Clapp Mexico
Sivaram K. Narayan United States
Jean-Christophe Bourin France
Mehmet Gürdal Türkiye
Ryszard Szwarc Poland
Masatoshi Fujii Japan
Igor Klep Slovenia
Minghua Lin relative to Takeaki Yamazaki Japan Takeaki Yamazaki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Takeaki Yamazaki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Minghua Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Minghua Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Minghua Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Minghua Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Minghua Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Minghua Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Minghua Lin. The network helps show where Minghua Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Minghua Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Minghua Lin Line = papers co-authored together Minghua Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201463
2 201656
3 201244
4 201441
5 201336
6 201335
7 201533
8 201331
9 201524
10 201624
11 201218
12 201218
13 201517
14 201417
15 201316
16 201614
17 201214
18 201210
19 201610
20 201010

About Minghua Lin

Minghua Lin is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Applied Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Numerical Analysis and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 53 papers that have together received 660 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Matrix Theory and Algorithms (44 papers), Mathematical Inequalities and Applications (35 papers), Mathematics and Applications (12 papers), Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research (9 papers), Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications (5 papers), Holomorphic and Operator Theory (5 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (5 papers) and Iterative Methods for Nonlinear Equations (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (561 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (546 citations), Geometry and Topology (221 citations), Numerical Analysis (98 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (47 citations). Minghua Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, China and Japan. Frequent co-authors include S.W. Drury, Tsuyoshi Andô, Jean-Christophe Bourin, Henry Wolkowicz, Eun‐Young Lee, Shigeru Furuichi, Fumio Hiai, Fuad Kıttaneh, Fuzhen Zhang and Gord Sinnamon. Their work appears in journals such as Linear Algebra and its Applications, Electronic Journal of Linear Algebra, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Comptes Rendus Mathématique and Applied Mathematics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact