Ming‐De Chen

29 papers receiving 948 citations

Peers

Ming‐De Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Rehabilitation 316
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 361
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 82
  • Occupational Therapy 51
  • Applied Psychology 35
Replace Carlos Ayán with:
Carlos Ayán Spain
Aviva Zeev Israel
Laurie Wishart Canada
Laurie A. Malone United States
Ji‐Hyuk Park South Korea
Shirley S.M. Fong Hong Kong
Gioia Mura Italy
Alessandra di Cagno Italy
Anne Visser‐Meily Netherlands
Donatella Valente Italy
Ming‐De Chen relative to Carlos Ayán Spain Carlos Ayán's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Carlos Ayán · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming‐De Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming‐De Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming‐De Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming‐De Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming‐De Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming‐De Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming‐De Chen. The network helps show where Ming‐De Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming‐De Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming‐De Chen Line = papers co-authored together Ming‐De Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010133
2 2011110
3 2016101
4 201199
5 201197
6 201670
7 201364
8 201262
9 201638
10 201528
11 201826
12 201518
13 201316
14 201616
15 201613
16 202213
17 201313
18 201713
19 201711
20 201611

About Ming‐De Chen

Ming‐De Chen is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Psychiatry and Mental health, Biological Psychiatry and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 32 papers that have together received 980 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (9 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (6 papers), Physical Activity and Health (6 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (3 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (3 papers) and Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (316 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (361 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (82 citations), Occupational Therapy (51 citations) and Applied Psychology (35 citations). Ming‐De Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include James H. Rimmer, Kelly Hsieh, Jeffrey A. McCubbin, Jana J. Peterson, Charles E. Drum, Chieh-ling Yang, Keh‐chung Lin, Ching‐Yi Wu, Jer‐Hao Chang and Chung‐Ying Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Disability and Rehabilitation, Mental health and physical activity, Physical Therapy, BioMed Research International and American Journal of Occupational Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026