Ming-Chu Chiang
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology top 5%
- General Health Professions
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Shu‐Hui YehSiew Tzuh TangLiwei LinWen‐Cheng ChangJen‐Shi ChenWen‐Chi ChouChia‐Hsun HsiehMing‐Mo Hou
- Topics
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers)Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers)Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Radiological and Ultrasound TechnologyCritical Care and Intensive Care MedicineResearch and Theory
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthMedicine
- Partner nations
- Taiwan
In The Last Decade
Ming-Chu Chiang
17 papers receiving 319 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 118
- Clinical Psychology 110
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 75
- General Health Professions 56
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 52
Countries citing papers authored by Ming-Chu Chiang
This map shows the geographic impact of Ming-Chu Chiang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming-Chu Chiang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming-Chu Chiang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ming-Chu Chiang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming-Chu Chiang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming-Chu Chiang. The network helps show where Ming-Chu Chiang may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ming-Chu Chiang
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ming-Chu Chiang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ming-Chu Chiang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ming-Chu Chiang. Ming-Chu Chiang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 37 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 44 | |
| 12 | 44 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | [Improving nursing staff accuracy in administering chemotherapy]. | 1 |
| 16 | 33 | |
| 17 | 62 |
About Ming-Chu Chiang
Ming-Chu Chiang is a scholar working on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Clinical Psychology and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (75 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (52 citations) and Research and Theory (5 citations). Ming-Chu Chiang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Shu‐Hui Yeh, Siew Tzuh Tang, Liwei Lin, Wen‐Cheng Chang, Jen‐Shi Chen, Wen‐Chi Chou, Chia‐Hsun Hsieh, Ming‐Mo Hou, Weiling Chen and Fur‐Hsing Wen. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.