Ming‐Chih Lin

131 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Ming‐Chih Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Physiology 87
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 356
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 492
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 210
  • Physiology 334
Replace Doron Schwartz with:
Doron Schwartz Israel
Chris Van Geet Belgium
Koichi Yuki United States
Tomoko Fujii Japan
Xiong Wang China
Nazima Pathan United Kingdom
Jing Chen China
Amy P. Hsu United States
Brian D. Shames United States
Keiji Kuba Japan
Ming‐Chih Lin relative to Doron Schwartz Israel Doron Schwartz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Doron Schwartz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming‐Chih Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming‐Chih Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming‐Chih Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming‐Chih Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming‐Chih Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming‐Chih Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming‐Chih Lin. The network helps show where Ming‐Chih Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming‐Chih Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming‐Chih Lin Line = papers co-authored together Ming‐Chih Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 144 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995220
2 1979144
3 1975139
4 1994104
5 197779
6 197568
7 197566
8 200856
9 201255
10 201452
11 199848
12 200947
13 201146
14 201346
15 197944
16
Measurement of post-lens tear thickness.
199941
17 201536
18 201734
19 200629
20 199129

About Ming‐Chih Lin

Ming‐Chih Lin is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 144 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital Heart Disease Studies (22 papers), Kawasaki Disease and Coronary Complications (17 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (12 papers), Coronary Artery Anomalies (11 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (10 papers), Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications (9 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (9 papers) and Cardiovascular Conditions and Treatments (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (87 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (356 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (492 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (210 citations) and Physiology (334 citations). Ming‐Chih Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Martin Rodbell, Yun‐Ching Fu, Chao‐Huei Chen, Marc Rendell, Yoram Salomon, Sheng‐Ling Jan, Dermot M.F. Cooper, Werner Schlegel, Constantine Londos and Teh‐Ming Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Frontiers in Pediatrics, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact