Ming Li

5.5k citations
197 papers · 4.0k · h-index 32

Impact in

Papers in

Ming Li

187 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

Ming Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 130
  • Nephrology 114
  • Epidemiology 304
  • Molecular Biology 507
  • Food Science 137
Replace Daniela Weber with:
Daniela Weber Germany
Béatrice Morio France
Marlies Leenaars Netherlands
Rob B.M. de Vries Netherlands
Lila Missae Oyama Brazil
Haiqing Shen United States
Tony K.T. Lam Canada
Mário J.A. Saad Brazil
Gaetano Serviddio Italy
Noriko Satoh Japan
Ming Li relative to Daniela Weber Germany Daniela Weber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Daniela Weber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming Li. The network helps show where Ming Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming Li Line = papers co-authored together Ming Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 197 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008270
2 2009148
3 2008135
4 2002121
5 2017109
6 200290
7 201881
8 200980
9 199470
10 200168
11 201265
12 201665
13 201963
14 200162
15 201562
16 201059
17 201959
18 200755
19 201353
20 201451

About Ming Li

Ming Li is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Nephrology, Epidemiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 197 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases (19 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (11 papers), Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (9 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (7 papers), Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (4 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (3 papers), Heme Oxygenase-1 and Carbon Monoxide (3 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (130 citations), Nephrology (114 citations), Epidemiology (304 citations), Molecular Biology (507 citations) and Food Science (137 citations). Ming Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Xinhua Xiao, Qian Zhang, Jia Zheng, Huong Ung, Irving Nachamkin, Nader G. Abraham, Dong Hyun Kim, Stephen J. Peterson, Susumu Ikehara and Fan Ping. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Endocrinology, Diabetes, Scientific Reports, International Journal of Obesity and Frontiers in Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact