Ming Fan

79 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Ming Fan
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Cancer Research 872
  • Radiation 344
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 640
  • Otorhinolaryngology 113
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 338
Replace Ruth Heimann with:
Ruth Heimann United States
Alan C. Hartford United States
Carolyn W. Taylor United Kingdom
Sunil P. P. Gulavita Canada
Frances K. Duane United Kingdom
Satoshi Itasaka Japan
Ludwig Plaßwilm Switzerland
Everett James Moding United States
Zsuzsanna Kahán Hungary
Ben Maat Netherlands
Ming Fan relative to Ruth Heimann United States Ruth Heimann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×14.7×
Ruth Heimann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming Fan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming Fan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming Fan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming Fan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming Fan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming Fan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming Fan. The network helps show where Ming Fan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming Fan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming Fan Line = papers co-authored together Ming Fan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001437
2 1997366
3 2020155
4 2002129
5 2002127
6
Occult metastases in the sentinel lymph nodes of patients with early stage breast carcinoma: A preliminary study.
1999124
7 1999104
8 200293
9 201487
10 200177
11 199869
12 199868
13 200167
14 200166
15 200265
16 200052
17 202052
18 199948
19 202044
20 202144

About Ming Fan

Ming Fan is a scholar working on Otorhinolaryngology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cancer Research, Oncology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 83 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Effects of Radiation Exposure (14 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (13 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (8 papers), Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (6 papers), Iron oxide chemistry and applications (5 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (5 papers), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers) and Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (872 citations), Radiation (344 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (640 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (113 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (338 citations). Ming Fan has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Kambiz Dowlatshahi, Howard C. Snider, Lawrence Bruce Marks, Donna R. Hollis, Fahim Habib, Michael T. Munley, Mitchell Steven Anscher, Pehr Lind, Gunilla C. Bentel and Kenneth Joel Bloom. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Cancer, Oral Oncology, British Journal of Radiology and Radiation Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact