Mina Dunnam

705 total citations
8 papers, 588 citations indexed

About

Mina Dunnam is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Mina Dunnam has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 588 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Clinical Psychology, 3 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 2 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Mina Dunnam's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury Research (2 papers). Mina Dunnam is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury Research (2 papers). Mina Dunnam collaborates with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Mina Dunnam's co-authors include Charles B. Bradshaw, James P. Donnelly, Gary C. Warner, Kerry Donnelly, Scott T. Meier, Paul R. King, Cecilia H. Solano, Cay Anderson‐Hanley, Molly Maloney and Brian D. Cohen and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Psychology Quarterly, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience and Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology.

In The Last Decade

Mina Dunnam

8 papers receiving 561 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mina Dunnam United States	7	281	177	174	125	117	8	588
Christina Dillahunt-Aspillaga United States	13	297 1.1×	106 0.6×	225 1.3×	89 0.7×	49 0.4×	51	580
Andrew Worthington United Kingdom	12	199 0.7×	44 0.2×	87 0.5×	77 0.6×	88 0.8×	29	421
Mark Sanderson‐Cimino United States	13	156 0.6×	131 0.7×	61 0.4×	61 0.5×	221 1.9×	32	539
B. N. Axelrod United States	14	209 0.7×	87 0.5×	86 0.5×	115 0.9×	227 1.9×	23	588
Kathy Williams United States	14	149 0.5×	139 0.8×	52 0.3×	57 0.5×	55 0.5×	17	422
Joseph L. Etherton United States	17	335 1.2×	134 0.8×	87 0.5×	90 0.7×	145 1.2×	33	882
Graham M.L. Eglit United States	15	133 0.5×	117 0.7×	50 0.3×	61 0.5×	199 1.7×	39	581
Jonathan D. Lichtenstein United States	19	716 2.5×	120 0.7×	308 1.8×	251 2.0×	262 2.2×	54	1.0k
Maya Yutsis United States	11	99 0.4×	144 0.8×	31 0.2×	44 0.4×	129 1.1×	25	603
Maria Pąchalska Poland	12	116 0.4×	67 0.4×	31 0.2×	64 0.5×	167 1.4×	107	612

Countries citing papers authored by Mina Dunnam

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mina Dunnam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mina Dunnam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mina Dunnam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mina Dunnam

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mina Dunnam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mina Dunnam. The network helps show where Mina Dunnam may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mina Dunnam

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mina Dunnam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mina Dunnam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mina Dunnam. Mina Dunnam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Anderson‐Hanley, Cay, Nicole Barcelos, Earl A. Zimmerman, et al.. (2018). The Aerobic and Cognitive Exercise Study (ACES) for Community-Dwelling Older Adults With or At-Risk for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): Neuropsychological, Neurobiological and Neuroimaging Outcomes of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 10. 76–76. 140 indexed citations

Stein, Emma, et al.. (2014). B-64 * Neuropsychological Benefits of Interactive Mental and Physical Exercise. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 29(6). 561–561. 4 indexed citations

Guyker, Wendy, Kerry Donnelly, James P. Donnelly, et al.. (2013). Dimensionality, Reliability, and Validity of the Combat Experiences Scale. Military Medicine. 178(4). 377–384. 58 indexed citations

King, Paul R., Kerry Donnelly, James P. Donnelly, et al.. (2012). Psychometric study of the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 49(6). 879–879. 197 indexed citations

Anderson‐Hanley, Cay, et al.. (2012). The Fuld Object-Memory Evaluation: Development and Validation of an Alternate Form. Applied Neuropsychology Adult. 20(1). 1–6. 14 indexed citations

Anderson‐Hanley, Cay, et al.. (2011). Neuropsychological and neurophysiological effects of strengthening exercise for early dementia: A pilot study. Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition. 19(3). 380–401. 15 indexed citations

Donnelly, Kerry, et al.. (2011). Reliability, Sensitivity, and Specificity of the VA Traumatic Brain Injury Screening Tool. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 26(6). 439–453. 119 indexed citations

Solano, Cecilia H. & Mina Dunnam. (1985). Two's Company: Self-Disclosure and Reciprocity in Triads Versus Dyads. Social Psychology Quarterly. 48(2). 183–183. 41 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact