Joseph L. Etherton
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Gordon D. LoganKevin W. GreveKevin J. BianchiniMatthew T. HeinlyStanley TaylorAmitai AbramovitchJonathan S. OrdKelly L. Curtis
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (16 papers)Traumatic Brain Injury Research (15 papers)Child and Animal Learning Development (5 papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONEJournal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and CognitionJournal of Family Psychology
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Joseph L. Etherton
32 papers receiving 838 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Epidemiology 335
- Cognitive Neuroscience 306
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 212
- Pharmacology 179
- Psychiatry and Mental health 145
Countries citing papers authored by Joseph L. Etherton
This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph L. Etherton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph L. Etherton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph L. Etherton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph L. Etherton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph L. Etherton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph L. Etherton. The network helps show where Joseph L. Etherton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph L. Etherton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph L. Etherton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph L. Etherton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph L. Etherton. Joseph L. Etherton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 29 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 50 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 40 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 37 | |
| 15 | 84 | |
| 16 | 58 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 59 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Joseph L. Etherton
Joseph L. Etherton is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Family Practice and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 882 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (16 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (15 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (212 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (306 citations) and Pharmacology (179 citations). Joseph L. Etherton has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gordon D. Logan, Kevin W. Greve, Kevin J. Bianchini, Matthew T. Heinly, Stanley Taylor, Amitai Abramovitch, Jonathan S. Ord, Kelly L. Curtis, John E. Meyers and Reiko Graham. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition and Journal of Family Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.