Mimi Biswas
About
In The Last Decade
Mimi Biswas
9 papers receiving 446 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 348
- Surgery 185
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 106
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 69
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 54
Countries citing papers authored by Mimi Biswas
This map shows the geographic impact of Mimi Biswas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mimi Biswas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mimi Biswas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mimi Biswas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mimi Biswas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mimi Biswas. The network helps show where Mimi Biswas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mimi Biswas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mimi Biswas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mimi Biswas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mimi Biswas. Mimi Biswas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 346 | |
| 10 | 44 | |
| 11 | 36 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.