Miles Rogers

434 total citations
8 papers, 147 citations indexed

About

Miles Rogers is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Miles Rogers has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 147 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 2 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Miles Rogers's work include 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (4 papers), Liver physiology and pathology (2 papers) and Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (1 paper). Miles Rogers is often cited by papers focused on 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (4 papers), Liver physiology and pathology (2 papers) and Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (1 paper). Miles Rogers collaborates with scholars based in United States. Miles Rogers's co-authors include Joseph L. Charest, Philip M. Keegan, Mingjian Lu, J Gosset, Shyam Sundhar Bale, Jacob Beal, Brian P. Cain, Jeffrey T. Borenstein, Maria E. Scott and David M. Bland and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Lab on a Chip.

In The Last Decade

Miles Rogers

8 papers receiving 146 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Miles Rogers United States	7	86	50	19	16	12	8	147
Mitsuhiro Nishida Japan	8	41 0.5×	110 2.2×	17 0.9×	4 0.3×	8 0.7×	13	227
Rebekah A. Reynolds United States	8	24 0.3×	91 1.8×	3 0.2×	15 0.9×	20 1.7×	11	236
Yu-Ja Huang United States	3	88 1.0×	160 3.2×	12 0.6×	33 2.1×	17 1.4×	4	251
Emily Suter United States	2	96 1.1×	46 0.9×	13 0.7×	3 0.2×	22 1.8×	3	169
Rong Xie China	9	35 0.4×	174 3.5×	23 1.2×	29 1.8×	19 1.6×	19	347
Patrice Binder France	5	24 0.3×	40 0.8×	3 0.2×	11 0.7×	11 0.9×	13	116
Kattika Kaarj United States	6	286 3.3×	142 2.8×	5 0.3×	6 0.4×	16 1.3×	9	333
Stefan A. Hoffmann Germany	9	77 0.9×	151 3.0×	70 3.7×	38 2.4×	48 4.0×	19	267
Hesung Now South Korea	5	78 0.9×	51 1.0×	2 0.1×	8 0.5×	5 0.4×	6	156
Nai-Yun Hsu United States	5	10 0.1×	164 3.3×	8 0.4×	51 3.2×	16 1.3×	5	266

Countries citing papers authored by Miles Rogers

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Miles Rogers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miles Rogers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miles Rogers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Miles Rogers

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miles Rogers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miles Rogers. The network helps show where Miles Rogers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Miles Rogers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Miles Rogers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Miles Rogers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Miles Rogers. Miles Rogers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Bartley, Bryan, Jacob Beal, Miles Rogers, et al.. (2023). Building an Open Representation for Biological Protocols. ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems. 19(3). 1–21. 8 indexed citations

2.

Luu, Rebeccah J., Ashley L. Gard, Miles Rogers, et al.. (2023). Fibroblast activation in response to TGFβ1 is modulated by co-culture with endothelial cells in a vascular organ-on-chip platform. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences. 10. 1160851–1160851. 6 indexed citations

3.

Rogers, Miles, Ashley L. Gard, Thomas J. Mulhern, et al.. (2021). A high-throughput microfluidic bilayer co-culture platform to study endothelial-pericyte interactions. Scientific Reports. 11(1). 12225–12225. 33 indexed citations

4.

Beal, Jacob & Miles Rogers. (2020). Levels of autonomy in synthetic biology engineering. Molecular Systems Biology. 16(12). e10019–e10019. 14 indexed citations

5.

Truslow, James G., et al.. (2020). Multipoint dilution hemofiltration: A new technology for maximum convective clearance. Artificial Organs. 44(7). 753–763. 1 indexed citations

6.

Keegan, Philip M., Miles Rogers, Mingjian Lu, et al.. (2019). A high-throughput microfluidic microphysiological system (PREDICT-96) to recapitulate hepatocyte function in dynamic, re-circulating flow conditions. Lab on a Chip. 19(9). 1556–1566. 61 indexed citations

7.

Rogers, Miles, Jennifer Keen, David M. Bland, et al.. (2015). Resistance to Innate Immunity Contributes to Colonization of the Insect Gut by Yersinia pestis. PLoS ONE. 10(7). e0133318–e0133318. 17 indexed citations

8.

Rogers, Miles, et al.. (2009). Histone-like nucleoid-structuring protein represses transcription of the ehx operon carried by locus of enterocyte effacement-negative Shiga toxin-expressing Escherichia coli. Microbial Pathogenesis. 47(4). 202–211. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact