Milena Büchs

2.9k total citations
58 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

Milena Büchs is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment. According to data from OpenAlex, Milena Büchs has authored 58 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 17 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and 15 papers in Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment. Recurrent topics in Milena Büchs's work include Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies (13 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (12 papers) and Energy and Environment Impacts (10 papers). Milena Büchs is often cited by papers focused on Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies (13 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (12 papers) and Energy and Environment Impacts (10 papers). Milena Büchs collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Italy. Milena Büchs's co-authors include Sylke V. Schnepf, Max Koch, Diana Ivanova, Daniel W. O’Neill, Andrew L. Fanning, Nicholas Bardsley, Giulio Mattioli, Graham Smith, Jonathan Norman and Alice Garvey and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Cleaner Production, Energy Policy and Nature Energy.

In The Last Decade

Milena Büchs

55 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Milena Büchs United Kingdom 25 483 388 372 354 268 58 1.8k
Rachel M. Krause United States 26 698 1.4× 518 1.3× 355 1.0× 768 2.2× 457 1.7× 56 2.9k
Stefan Drews Spain 22 853 1.8× 854 2.2× 796 2.1× 468 1.3× 88 0.3× 43 2.5k
Steffen Kallbekken Norway 23 581 1.2× 1.2k 3.1× 656 1.8× 660 1.9× 66 0.2× 77 2.5k
Ian Bailey United Kingdom 27 699 1.4× 460 1.2× 657 1.8× 186 0.5× 233 0.9× 78 2.3k
Sverker C. Jagers Sweden 30 1.0k 2.1× 899 2.3× 1000 2.7× 362 1.0× 204 0.8× 92 2.7k
Doris Fuchs Germany 20 412 0.9× 216 0.6× 375 1.0× 188 0.5× 132 0.5× 64 2.1k
Noel Healy United States 13 628 1.3× 245 0.6× 287 0.8× 229 0.6× 105 0.4× 13 1.4k
Kate Raworth United Kingdom 11 373 0.8× 271 0.7× 272 0.7× 112 0.3× 123 0.5× 19 1.7k
Kyle W. Knight United States 14 354 0.7× 615 1.6× 388 1.0× 366 1.0× 33 0.1× 18 1.3k
Saba Siddiki United States 23 519 1.1× 182 0.5× 125 0.3× 269 0.8× 536 2.0× 68 2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Milena Büchs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Milena Büchs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Milena Büchs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Milena Büchs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Milena Büchs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Milena Büchs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Milena Büchs. The network helps show where Milena Büchs may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Milena Büchs

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Milena Büchs. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Milena Büchs based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Milena Büchs. Milena Büchs is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Owen, Anne & Milena Büchs. (2024). Examining changes in household carbon footprints across generations in the UK using decomposition analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 28(6). 1786–1800. 4 indexed citations
2.
Willand, Nicola, Lucie Middlemiss, Milena Büchs, & Pepa Ambrosio-Albalá. (2024). Understanding essential energy through functionings: A comparative study across six energy poverty trials in Europe. Energy Research & Social Science. 118. 103834–103834. 4 indexed citations
3.
Büchs, Milena, et al.. (2024). Intersectionality in good faith: Beyond normative claims and towards practical integration in energy justice research. Energy Research & Social Science. 119. 103823–103823. 3 indexed citations
4.
Garvey, Alice, Milena Büchs, Jonathan Norman, & John Barrett. (2024). “How could it be our responsibility?” The equity of Local Authority climate action in England. Local Environment. 30(1). 81–97.
5.
Büchs, Milena, Noel Cass, Caroline Mullen, Karen Lucas, & Diana Ivanova. (2023). Emissions savings from equitable energy demand reduction. Nature Energy. 8(7). 758–769. 51 indexed citations
6.
Bridgen, Paul, et al.. (2023). Climate Crisis and Social Protection - From Worker Protection to Post-growth Transformation?. Social Policy and Society. 22(4). 695–714. 13 indexed citations
7.
Ivanova, Diana & Milena Büchs. (2023). Barriers and enablers around radical sharing. The Lancet Planetary Health. 7(9). e784–e792. 7 indexed citations
8.
Mattioli, Giulio, Milena Büchs, & Joachim Scheiner. (2023). Who flies but never drives? Highlighting diversity among high emitters for passenger transport in England. Energy Research & Social Science. 99. 103057–103057. 8 indexed citations
9.
Büchs, Milena & Giulio Mattioli. (2022). How socially just are taxes on air travel and ‘frequent flyer levies’?. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 32(1). 62–84. 24 indexed citations
10.
Büchs, Milena, et al.. (2022). An Ecological Basic Income? Examining the Ecological Credentials of Basic Income Through a Review of Selected Pilot Interventions. Basic Income Studies. 18(1). 47–87. 3 indexed citations
11.
Brand-Correa, Lina, et al.. (2022). Economics for people and planet—moving beyond the neoclassical paradigm. The Lancet Planetary Health. 6(4). e371–e379. 48 indexed citations
12.
Büchs, Milena, et al.. (2022). Public acceptance of post-growth: Factors and implications for post-growth strategy. Futures. 143. 103020–103020. 35 indexed citations
13.
Büchs, Milena, Diana Ivanova, & Sylke V. Schnepf. (2021). Fairness, effectiveness, and needs satisfaction: new options for designing climate policies. Environmental Research Letters. 16(12). 124026–124026. 25 indexed citations
14.
Büchs, Milena & Max Koch. (2018). Challenges for the degrowth transition: The debate about wellbeing. Futures. 105. 155–165. 144 indexed citations
15.
Bardsley, Nicholas, Milena Büchs, & Sylke V. Schnepf. (2016). Something from nothing: Estimating consumption rates using propensity scores, with application to emissions reduction policies. Joint Research Centre (European Commission). 5 indexed citations
16.
Smith, Graham, et al.. (2010). Mainstreaming the environment? the third sector and environmental performance management. The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease. 10(3). 523–529. 4 indexed citations
17.
Büchs, Milena. (2009). The Open Method of Coordination - Effectively Preventing Welfare State Retrenchment?. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 13(1). 7. 6 indexed citations
18.
Büchs, Milena, et al.. (2008). The multilevel governance of welfare states in Europe: the decentralization of labour market policies in four member states. Orvosi Hetilap. 113(39). 2337–40. 1 indexed citations
19.
Büchs, Milena. (2008). How Legitimate is the Open Method of Co‐ordination?*. JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies. 46(4). 765–786. 42 indexed citations
20.
Büchs, Milena. (2007). New governance in European social policy: the open method of coordination. Palgrave Macmillan eBooks. 1101(1). 20–8. 50 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026