Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Mike Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mike Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mike Wright more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mike Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mike Wright. The network helps show where Mike Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mike Wright
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mike Wright.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mike Wright based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mike Wright. Mike Wright is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Qin, Fei, et al.. (2019). Intra-ecosystem variety: How entrepreneurial agency influences venture development in a time-compressed accelerator. Industrial and Corporate Change.1 indexed citations
2.
Wood, Geoffrey & Mike Wright. (2018). What Brexit tells us about institutions and social action. Spiral (Imperial College London).4 indexed citations
3.
Boyer, Robert, Julie Froud, Christopher Grey, et al.. (2016). Brexit: UK as an exception or the banal avant garde of the disintegration of the EU?. Socio-Economic Review. 15. 807–854.2 indexed citations
Fini, Riccardo, Rosa Grimaldi, Simone Santoni, & Mike Wright. (2012). How Does Team Diversity Evolve? Exploring Adaptation and Perpetuation Perspectives in Entrepreneurial Team Change. Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna).1 indexed citations
6.
Ucbasaran, Deniz, Gry Agnete Alsos, Paul Westhead, & Mike Wright. (2008). Habitual Entrepreneurs. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 4(4). 309–450.63 indexed citations
Dale, Barrie G., et al.. (2001). Triple Inaugural Address for the Rotating Chair for Research in Organisation and Management. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).
11.
Wright, Mike, Igor Filatotchev, & Michael Bleaney. (1999). Privatization, Insider Control and Managerial Entrenchment in Russia. SSRN Electronic Journal.11 indexed citations
Lynch, T. Sean, Paul Kerlin, Tat Hin Ong, et al.. (1989). Liver transplantation in Australia: The Queensland experience. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.