Miguel Porto
- Ecology top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Pedro BejaLuís ReinoJoana SantanaFrancisco MoreiraRui MorgadoOtília CorreiaAntónio MiraCésar Capinha
- Topics
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (18 papers)Species Distribution and Climate Change (10 papers)Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna (10 papers)
In The Last Decade
Miguel Porto
39 papers receiving 691 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Ecology 409
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 360
- Global and Planetary Change 198
- Ecological Modeling 182
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 160
Countries citing papers authored by Miguel Porto
This map shows the geographic impact of Miguel Porto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miguel Porto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miguel Porto more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Miguel Porto
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miguel Porto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miguel Porto. The network helps show where Miguel Porto may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Miguel Porto
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Miguel Porto. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Miguel Porto based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Miguel Porto. Miguel Porto is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 55 | |
| 17 | Onosma tricerosperma subsp. tricerosperma Lag. (Boraginaceae), a new species and genus to the portuguese flora | 2 |
| 18 | Elatine brochonii Clavaud (Elatinaceae), a new species to the portuguese flora | 1 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Miguel Porto
Miguel Porto is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 710 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (18 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (10 papers) and Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (182 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (360 citations) and Ecology (409 citations). Miguel Porto has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Spain and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Pedro Beja, Luís Reino, Joana Santana, Francisco Moreira, Rui Morgado, Otília Correia, António Mira, César Capinha, Franz Essl and Luís Gordinho. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and The Science of The Total Environment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.