Miguel Ángel Checa
- Reproductive Medicine top 0.5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 1%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 1%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 2%
- Immunology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ramón CarrerasIván SolàMireia González-ComadranBénédicte JacqueminKarinna LattesSelmo GeberM. BrassescoMatheus Roque
- Topics
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (25 papers)Reproductive Biology and Fertility (24 papers)Ovarian function and disorders (23 papers)
In The Last Decade
Miguel Ángel Checa
77 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Reproductive Medicine 1.5k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.2k
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 747
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 319
- Immunology 270
Countries citing papers authored by Miguel Ángel Checa
This map shows the geographic impact of Miguel Ángel Checa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miguel Ángel Checa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miguel Ángel Checa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Miguel Ángel Checa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miguel Ángel Checa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miguel Ángel Checa. The network helps show where Miguel Ángel Checa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Miguel Ángel Checa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Miguel Ángel Checa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Miguel Ángel Checa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Miguel Ángel Checa. Miguel Ángel Checa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 21 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 32 | |
| 6 | 72 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysisbreakdown → | 399 |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 41 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | Patología de la uretra femenina y del vestíbulo vaginal | 2 |
About Miguel Ángel Checa
Miguel Ángel Checa is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 79 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (25 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (24 papers) and Ovarian function and disorders (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (1.5k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.2k citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (319 citations). Miguel Ángel Checa has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, France and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Ramón Carreras, Iván Solà, Mireia González-Comadran, Bénédicte Jacquemin, Karinna Lattes, Selmo Geber, M. Brassesco, Matheus Roque, Rafael Lafuente and Juan José Espinós. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Human Reproduction and Fertility and Sterility.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.