Michiel Pillet
About
In The Last Decade
Michiel Pillet
5 papers receiving 128 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 59
- Global and Planetary Change 57
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 35
- Ecology 29
- Ecological Modeling 24
Countries citing papers authored by Michiel Pillet
This map shows the geographic impact of Michiel Pillet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michiel Pillet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michiel Pillet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michiel Pillet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michiel Pillet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michiel Pillet. The network helps show where Michiel Pillet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michiel Pillet
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michiel Pillet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michiel Pillet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michiel Pillet. Michiel Pillet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 56 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 32 | |
| 5 | 28 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.