Michelle R. Knight

499 total citations
8 papers, 422 citations indexed

About

Michelle R. Knight is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Signal Processing and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, Michelle R. Knight has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 422 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 papers in Signal Processing and 2 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in Michelle R. Knight's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (7 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (4 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (2 papers). Michelle R. Knight is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (7 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (4 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (2 papers). Michelle R. Knight collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Belgium. Michelle R. Knight's co-authors include Lawrence T. Cohen, Robert Cowan, Elaine Saunders, Stefan J. Mauger, Roland Laszig, Antje Aschendorff, Michael Tykocinski, Susan B. Waltzman, William H. Shapiro and Hugh J. McDermott and has published in prestigious journals such as Hearing Research, Ear and Hearing and International Journal of Audiology.

In The Last Decade

Michelle R. Knight

8 papers receiving 407 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Michelle R. Knight Australia	7	409	256	178	130	43	8	422
Christine Menapace United States	8	348 0.9×	197 0.8×	156 0.9×	122 0.9×	50 1.2×	9	380
Rolf‐Dieter Battmer Germany	13	445 1.1×	311 1.2×	143 0.8×	99 0.8×	97 2.3×	24	478
Wai Kong Lai Switzerland	14	471 1.2×	308 1.2×	125 0.7×	116 0.9×	26 0.6×	29	502
R. Hollow Australia	9	418 1.0×	245 1.0×	190 1.1×	93 0.7×	47 1.1×	16	455
Phil Segel United States	6	317 0.8×	168 0.7×	159 0.9×	124 1.0×	22 0.5×	6	338
Wendy Parkinson United States	12	631 1.5×	410 1.6×	302 1.7×	162 1.2×	66 1.5×	16	672
Julie G. Arenberg United States	16	494 1.2×	333 1.3×	244 1.4×	144 1.1×	22 0.5×	45	550
Alain Sigrist Switzerland	9	397 1.0×	291 1.1×	133 0.7×	102 0.8×	42 1.0×	12	485
J. Müller-Deile Germany	14	717 1.8×	469 1.8×	308 1.7×	189 1.5×	74 1.7×	38	761
Maria-Izabel Kós Switzerland	8	365 0.9×	257 1.0×	164 0.9×	123 0.9×	47 1.1×	14	391

Countries citing papers authored by Michelle R. Knight

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle R. Knight's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle R. Knight with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle R. Knight more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle R. Knight

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle R. Knight. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle R. Knight. The network helps show where Michelle R. Knight may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michelle R. Knight

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michelle R. Knight. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michelle R. Knight based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michelle R. Knight. Michelle R. Knight is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Mauger, Stefan J., et al.. (2014). Clinical evaluation of the Nucleus^®6 cochlear implant system: Performance improvements with SmartSound iQ. International Journal of Audiology. 53(8). 564–576. 92 indexed citations

2.

Dawson, William O., et al.. (2007). Clinical Evaluation of Expanded Input Dynamic Range in Nucleus Cochlear Implants. Ear and Hearing. 28(2). 163–176. 37 indexed citations

3.

Cohen, Lawrence T., Elaine Saunders, Michelle R. Knight, & Robert Cowan. (2006). Psychophysical measures in patients fitted with Contour™ and straight Nucleus electrode arrays. Hearing Research. 212(1-2). 160–175. 56 indexed citations

4.

Plant, Kerrie, et al.. (2005). Evaluation of Streamlined Programming Procedures for the Nucleus Cochlear Implant with the Contour Electrode Array. Ear and Hearing. 26(6). 651–668. 31 indexed citations

5.

Cooper, Huw, Paul Van de Heyning, Katrien Vermeire, et al.. (2003). Comparison between NRT-based MAPs and behaviourally measured MAPs at different stimulation rates – a multicentre investigation. Cochlear Implants International. 4(4). 161–170. 11 indexed citations

6.

Cooper, Huw, Paul Van de Heyning, Katrien Vermeire, et al.. (2003). Comparison between NRT-based MAPs and behaviourally measured MAPs at different stimulation rates – a multicentre investigation. Cochlear Implants International. 4(4). 161–170. 1 indexed citations

7.

Saunders, Elaine, Lawrence T. Cohen, Antje Aschendorff, et al.. (2002). Threshold, Comfortable Level and Impedance Changes as a Function of Electrode-Modiolar Distance. Ear and Hearing. 23(Supplement). 28S–40S. 166 indexed citations

8.

McDermott, Hugh J. & Michelle R. Knight. (2001). Preliminary Results with the AVR ImpaCt Frequency-Transposing Hearing Aid. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 12(3). 121–127. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact